SEGA Mega Drive Classics Official GBAtemp Review

i would suggest to explain whats wrong instead using a "?"

@Prans there is no link for the review, but since this was 15 minutes ago i assume you still working in this post

 

But the "Where's Waldo" method is more fun for everyone! What you did is akin to bringing a calculator to a math class. Tisk tisk.

 

all those mini retro shoverwares are lousy

 

The review link's text is split into 2 different clickable links. Are you tired?
It appears that you cannot make some of the text italic without doing this. Disregard.

 

redundancy, if he failed in one part, we would get the second part working? ;O; we are just missing parity to know which link is the good one ;O;

 

I edited my post.

 

ok this post is becoming trashed :C i will report and ask for cleanup later

But you can... just like this you are free to do asyou like

 

Finally,"VC" for switch

 

It's sad when Sega puts more effort into their retro games than Nintendo

 

Nintendo WHY?

 

Because they're lazy

 

They screwed nintendo club. (Anyway,I'm living in Russia)

 

I wouldn't know anything about that

 

This game is hard as F to find at retail.

 

@migles I think it's an error with switching between BBCode Editor and Rich Text Editor. The conversion to Rich Text (previewed text) causes a loss in some of the formatting.
@Prans
It's
SEGA Mega Drive Classics Official GBAtemp Review
not
SEGA Mega Drive Classics Official GBAtemp Review

I hope that displays correctly. :|

Edit: Aaaaaaand posting butchered it.

Edit 2:
[ B ] [ I ] [ URL = 'https://gbatemp.net/review/sega-mega-drive-classics.911/' ] SEGA Mega Drive Classics [ / I ] Official GBAtemp Review [ / URL ] [ / B ]
defaults to
[ B ] [ I ] [ URL = 'https://gbatemp.net/review/sega-mega-drive-classics.911/' ] SEGA Mega Drive Classics [ / URL ] [ / I ] [ URL = 'https://gbatemp.net/review/sega-mega-drive-classics.911/' ] Official GBAtemp Review [ / URL ] [ / B ]
and is an error.

 

Though not in their mini consoles...