It is not the first new "console/handheld"SEGA made since they abandoned the Dreamcast. They have so many different models of these Genesis-games, that can be directly played without cartridges. Here just one example:
http://www.amazon.de/Konsole-Spielen-Sonic..._pr_product_top
There is for example also just a controller, that you plug into your tv and you can immediately play Sonic 1-3. I think something like that is for little children pretty good and very common.
And to those who say, that you can buy a collection for PS360 or Wii: You need the console first!!! (I know: Mr. Obvious)
On your biased Sonic-comment I don`t even want to say anything. That`s dedicated to many in these deformed Sega-threads, that for some reason end up being discussion about Sonic. Stay on Topic... (any Moderate around...)
On your Bayonetta Statement: Be grateful that Sega has given you the chance to play such a game, because if it wasn`t for Sega there would just be a X360-version. And as far as I can see the PS3-version is not that inferior to the 360-version as you make us believe here (I haven`t played it but: 360: 89.84%; PS3: 86.19%; Source: Gamerankings.com).
And that`s what Gabe Newell from Valve said about the PS3: "The PC and the 360 are just more straightforward. We can focus on what we want to do, which is make game experiences, instead of sweating bullets over obscure architectural decisions they make with their platform. [...] I didn’t come into this business in the 90s because of some technical fetish. I came in because I wanted to give people experiences that made them have fun."
Not that I don`t like the PS3 but I guess it is not as easy as you might think to port a game over from 360 to PS3...
http://www.amazon.de/Konsole-Spielen-Sonic..._pr_product_top
There is for example also just a controller, that you plug into your tv and you can immediately play Sonic 1-3. I think something like that is for little children pretty good and very common.
And to those who say, that you can buy a collection for PS360 or Wii: You need the console first!!! (I know: Mr. Obvious)
First of all the Dreamcast was the only reason Sega is still around and healthy. I`m not going to prove this, since everybody can do a little research on their own before given some stupid statement.deanxxczx said:Go back to your cave.Giga_Gaia said:Wait, are they serious? Why haven't they understood that everything they touch turns to ****.
The dreamcast was an epic failure and they haven't even made a good Sonic game since Sonic Adventure 2. Hell, they can't even port a game like Bayonetta.
Seriously, why can't they just die already, the gaming community may be better without them.
On your biased Sonic-comment I don`t even want to say anything. That`s dedicated to many in these deformed Sega-threads, that for some reason end up being discussion about Sonic. Stay on Topic... (any Moderate around...)
On your Bayonetta Statement: Be grateful that Sega has given you the chance to play such a game, because if it wasn`t for Sega there would just be a X360-version. And as far as I can see the PS3-version is not that inferior to the 360-version as you make us believe here (I haven`t played it but: 360: 89.84%; PS3: 86.19%; Source: Gamerankings.com).
And that`s what Gabe Newell from Valve said about the PS3: "The PC and the 360 are just more straightforward. We can focus on what we want to do, which is make game experiences, instead of sweating bullets over obscure architectural decisions they make with their platform. [...] I didn’t come into this business in the 90s because of some technical fetish. I came in because I wanted to give people experiences that made them have fun."
Not that I don`t like the PS3 but I guess it is not as easy as you might think to port a game over from 360 to PS3...