Revenge of the Chackers!

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by Bitbyte, Oct 28, 2006.

Oct 28, 2006

Revenge of the Chackers! by Bitbyte at 7:13 PM (721 Views / 0 Likes) 7 replies

  1. Bitbyte
    OP

    Member Bitbyte GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    985
    Location:
    ._________.
    Country:
    Belgium
  2. bay0man

    Banned bay0man Banned

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    94
    Country:
    Finland
    iams so happ that you use my invetedn word! chacker = means chinese hacker \o/
     
  3. PineappleH

    Member PineappleH GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Country:
    United States
    Wow! Unbelievable. Once I saw the title, I thought to myself; Chackers? Does it mean Chinese hackers? And to my surprise, my guess was exactly right. Although I guessed it right, I don't like this term. There are other countries that starts with "C", so it'll get very confusing.
     
  4. Smuff

    Member Smuff Fossilized Gamer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    By the sea
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    nice av bitbyte [​IMG]
     
  5. Shinji

    Member Shinji ҉҉ ҉҉

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,374
    Location:
    City of Delusion
    Country:
    United States
    bay0man, you have made me the man I am today (see ava and title)
    XD
     
  6. mthrnite

    Former Staff mthrnite So it goes.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,523
    Location:
    th' south
    Country:
    United States
    Just to clarify for those scoring at home:

    Chacker
    [​IMG]

    Czecker
    [​IMG]

    Chinese Checkers
    [​IMG]

    Everybody got that straight?
     
  7. Mehdi

    Member Mehdi Lemonade by Psyfira

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,071
    Country:
    Netherlands
    lol@mthrnite
     
  8. cenotaph

    Member cenotaph GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    341
    Country:
    United States
    The article is just ridiculous and doesn't really tell anything about the attacks in question. What platforms were targeted? Were they just using bruteforce scanners to find poorly administrated boxes (don't laugh, it's been known to happen at government branches)? Exploits for recent security holes in various software providing public Internet services? It's not like they leave classified information on such systems, so why bother?

    ... but I guess I shouldn't expect anything else from The Register. Big headlines, little information -- just like certain parts of the regular press.

    Edit: something else that came to mind while reading... the lack of information in the article is obviously due to the source material, which must've been some press release. I'm not really the one to jump onto the conspiracy bandwagon, and I certainly do not doubt that these attacks have taken place - however, I do believe it's being made out to be more than what it actually was.

    If nothing else, it's an awfully convenient way of exercising some protectionism (oh SHI-, now that we've been the target of this HORRIBLE attack we have a reason for NOT investing in this company based in a country we don't like, even though it would save money on behalf of tax payers. Oh well...).
     

Share This Page