Revenge of the Chackers!

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by Bitbyte, Oct 28, 2006.

  1. Bitbyte
    OP

    Bitbyte GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    987
    13
    Dec 20, 2003
    Belgium
    ._________.
  2. bay0man

    bay0man Banned

    Banned
    94
    0
    May 22, 2004
    Finland
    iams so happ that you use my invetedn word! chacker = means chinese hacker \o/
     
  3. PineappleH

    PineappleH GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    234
    0
    Jan 9, 2005
    United States
    Wow! Unbelievable. Once I saw the title, I thought to myself; Chackers? Does it mean Chinese hackers? And to my surprise, my guess was exactly right. Although I guessed it right, I don't like this term. There are other countries that starts with "C", so it'll get very confusing.
     
  4. Smuff

    Smuff Fossilized Gamer

    Member
    1,024
    176
    Jul 29, 2006
    By the sea
    nice av bitbyte [​IMG]
     
  5. Shinji

    Shinji ҉҉ ҉҉

    Member
    2,374
    0
    Nov 6, 2002
    United States
    City of Delusion
    bay0man, you have made me the man I am today (see ava and title)
    XD
     
  6. mthrnite

    mthrnite So it goes.

    Former Staff
    4,529
    944
    Jun 30, 2006
    United States
    th' south
    Just to clarify for those scoring at home:

    Chacker
    [​IMG]

    Czecker
    [​IMG]

    Chinese Checkers
    [​IMG]

    Everybody got that straight?
     
  7. Mehdi

    Mehdi Lemonade by Psyfira

    Member
    1,071
    0
    May 31, 2004
    Netherlands
    lol@mthrnite
     
  8. cenotaph

    cenotaph GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    341
    0
    Oct 24, 2006
    United States
    The article is just ridiculous and doesn't really tell anything about the attacks in question. What platforms were targeted? Were they just using bruteforce scanners to find poorly administrated boxes (don't laugh, it's been known to happen at government branches)? Exploits for recent security holes in various software providing public Internet services? It's not like they leave classified information on such systems, so why bother?

    ... but I guess I shouldn't expect anything else from The Register. Big headlines, little information -- just like certain parts of the regular press.

    Edit: something else that came to mind while reading... the lack of information in the article is obviously due to the source material, which must've been some press release. I'm not really the one to jump onto the conspiracy bandwagon, and I certainly do not doubt that these attacks have taken place - however, I do believe it's being made out to be more than what it actually was.

    If nothing else, it's an awfully convenient way of exercising some protectionism (oh SHI-, now that we've been the target of this HORRIBLE attack we have a reason for NOT investing in this company based in a country we don't like, even though it would save money on behalf of tax payers. Oh well...).