Apparently I'm the only person that actually read the thing.
True but if junk is missing should you be more qualified? Or even with out. Should be bassed on brain not neither region unless hirer wants what is below or filling underprivileged.
One of the biggest hurdles for any job application to go anywhere is to get noticed. Anything that sticks out is more likely to get attention over the other sea of resumes, and dramatically increases chances of a reply unless there's a deal breaker in there. The resumes the experiment drafted were entirely identical except for the name, email, and cover letter.
Chances are a good amount of bias came from just the novelty of a woman's name sticking out like a sore thumb from swathes of male applicants. Women in IT are still rare after all, thus catching the eye just because it's less expected to see one.
If there is an algorithm that sorts things before a human ever sees any application that bias may not be there, helping explain why longer established companies didn't have that bias as much, or even opposite bias.