In terms of usability, it's useable. It's the bells and whistles in other cfw that makes us feel like it's outdated.
As for "dying projects without warning" fair statement, but again it does not apply to this case because it's not like we haven't heard anything about it to speculate that it's dead. We have official word from one of the devs that it is not dead.
I do think it will die (though I hope not.. Can't see the logic in removing the tools only to kill it right after). But we - as users - can't declare it dead just because it feels like it. We are basing it on lack of update and activity while forgetting the devs work in their own time. They aren't bound to a certain timeline. It's just disrespectful to anyone working on it to say it's dead just because other projects are miles ahead as of now.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Oh I never said anything to contradict that. All what you said is true at the current moment. It is outdated. It does lack features, and is definitely not recommended to use at the moment. What I am talking about is just pushing around the term "dead" just because of the above. The way I see it, it's disrespectful.
True, but the case are nowhere close to each other:
- The statement was relatively recent (A month ago or something)
-
@AlbertoSONIC kept us relatively updated on the status. I have faith that if something drastic would happen to it, he would come out and say it. No one owes us anything after all.
- Teams like M3 or Gateway and any flashcart teams are looking for money. If they change their direction to a negative one, do you honestly believe they'll outright come out and say "oh hey we abandoned this product"? The more sales they make, the happier they are. I don't think you can count them in the same league as HB/cfw devs in forums and such where they interact with users.
I realize the above might've just been a bad example, and the main idea still somewhat holds. But I don't believe it's the case for projects that are as big as rxTools once was.