Readability of wikipedia is too low

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by shadowmanwkp, Sep 4, 2012.

  1. shadowmanwkp
    OP

    shadowmanwkp Your roms are on another rom site

    Member
    486
    33
    Apr 17, 2008
    Netherlands
    Vleuten, The Netherlands
    A recently published paper and newly launched site "readability of wikipedia", states that wikipedia is too hard to read for people with not much knowledge of English. Along with the site, the findings were also published in "First Monday." According to the research, 73,5 per cent of the articles are "moderately hard" or even "very hard" On top of that, 45 per cent of the articles are "hard" or "very hard" to read.

    The research was conducted using the Flesch Reading Ease test. This test analyzes a text based on the lengths of words and the lengths of the sentences. The higher the score, the easier a text is to read, which is detailed here. Interestingly, the "simple English version" of wikipedia is also deemed too hard to read, scoring 60 points, while 80 points would be expected for people with not much English knowledge.

    You can read more in the source material:
    [​IMG]readability of wikipedia
    [​IMG]An online version of the paper (highly detailed in-depth stuff)
     
  2. ferofax

    ferofax End of the World

    Member
    2,566
    437
    Jan 26, 2009
    Philippines
    Which is why we have it in OTHER languages.

    And Wikipedia, by virtue of being a -pedia, is meant to use encyclopaedic level of English. It's NOT supposed to be easy, but formally informative.
     
    10 people like this.
  3. Costello

    Costello Headmaster

    Administrator
    12,454
    5,812
    Oct 24, 2002
    the simple english version seemed simple enough to me, to be honest.
    honestly I was surprised when I learnt that there was a "simple english" version...
    I mean, this is the internet right? if you come across a word you don't know, you just look it up on a search engine and voila...
     
    6 people like this.
  4. Bladexdsl

    Bladexdsl ZOMG my posts...it's over 9000!!!

    Member
    16,389
    3,983
    Nov 17, 2008
    Australia
    Queensland
    learn english than problem solved
     
    2 people like this.
  5. Veho

    Veho The man who cried "Ni".

    Former Staff
    8,908
    17,230
    Apr 4, 2006
    Croatia
    Zagreb
    You come across a word you don't know, you look it up on Wikipedia :ha:

    I thought this was about the typeface or the layout or something, not about "oh, our program thinks it has long words". Besides, it depends on the article. The more scientific articles have longer words, no big surprise there. But the more mundane articles, for example about movies or celebrities or food, are written in a more informal style and don't have scary long words, and don't require advanced knowledge of English.
     
    4 people like this.
  6. jalaneme

    jalaneme Female Gamer

    Member
    6,248
    195
    Nov 27, 2006
    London
    wikipedia is available in other languages so why didn't they take advantage of that unless they can't read their own languages either? it just shows how dumb they are.
     
  7. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Member
    10,254
    17,404
    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey
    Here's an encyclopedia free and open to the public, and they still find something to complain about. It's ri-wiki-lous!
     
    4 people like this.
  8. Necron

    Necron Lurking~

    Member
    878
    119
    Dec 29, 2008
    Chile
    Mi casa
    There are some intances (it has happened to me a lot) when the English article has more relevant information or is more complete.

    But... about the results of the studies, that is not Wikipedia's problem, but the people not knowing English.
     
  9. gamefan5

    gamefan5 Kid Icarus Uprising connoiseur

    Member
    4,947
    2,071
    Aug 29, 2010
    Canada
    Somewhere in this Earth
    That's not wikipedia's problem. It must be the internet making people dumber.
    Wikipedia, is a fricking enyclopedia, it was never made to be 'easy to read'.
    Just learn proper english. You know? English with grammar. Problem solved.
     
    3 people like this.
  10. MasterPenguin

    MasterPenguin GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    424
    24
    Jul 16, 2008
    Canada
    73.5 + 45 = 118.5%. 118% of Wikipedia is hard to read... Indeed.
     
  11. Izen

    Izen GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    180
    85
    Jan 28, 2012
    United States
    BREAKING NEWS: People who have trouble reading English are having trouble reading English articles; totally unnecessary test confirms common sense theory.
     
    6 people like this.
  12. Law

    Law rip ninjacat that zarcon made me

    Member
    4,132
    217
    Aug 14, 2007
    ‭jerkland
    breaking news: stupid people can't read. Website that has information stupid people need unreadable by target audience.
     
  13. jumpman17

    jumpman17 He's a semi-aquatic egg laying mammal of action!

    Former Staff
    8,996
    183
    Apr 11, 2003
    United States
    73.5% + 45% = 118.5%

    So...they've evaluated articles that haven't even been created yet?
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Ammako

    Ammako GBAtemp Guru

    Member
    6,424
    3,547
    Dec 22, 2009
    Canada
    I've fixed your post.

    What if English is their own language?
    And that they don't know any other languages?
     
  15. ferofax

    ferofax End of the World

    Member
    2,566
    437
    Jan 26, 2009
    Philippines
    To be fair, I dislike reading online stuff in my own language (Tagalog), lol. It's not that I hate the language, it just feels so... cheesy. But then again, literacy-wise, I'm much more fluent in English than in my own language.
     
  16. Bitbyte

    Bitbyte GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    989
    13
    Dec 20, 2003
    Belgium
    ._________.
    "We found that 73.5 percent of all articles scored below the suggested goal of 60 (Standard), whereas 45.0 percent could even be qualified as difficult or worse (
     
  17. Fishaman P

    Fishaman P Speedrunner

    Member
    3,243
    507
    Jan 2, 2010
    United States
    Wisconsin
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. gamefan5

    gamefan5 Kid Icarus Uprising connoiseur

    Member
    4,947
    2,071
    Aug 29, 2010
    Canada
    Somewhere in this Earth
    I'm pretty sure most people that reads english can't understand Wikipedia. That's why the word 'proper' and 'grammar' were used.
    I actually wasn't kidding around when I made my post.
     
  19. jumpman17

    jumpman17 He's a semi-aquatic egg laying mammal of action!

    Former Staff
    8,996
    183
    Apr 11, 2003
    United States
     
  20. Ultymoo

    Ultymoo GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    121
    26
    Sep 13, 2009
    United States
    Wikipedia - Extra Simple English Edition:

    This is Joe.
    Joe is doing science!
    Science, Joe, Science.


    ulternitivly u kud rite en rtickle liek dis
     
    3 people like this.