no he hasn't. year zero which was the last album by him was released on interscope. i don't call that being broke from the labels.
But until then his last effort was released on a label.
No kidding. I didn't say prior to his last album, did I?
Ok where is the sonic proof? There is none. We will see how he tries to release that when it comes time.
But until then his last effort was released on a label.
No kidding. I didn't say prior to his last album, did I?
Ok where is the sonic proof? There is none. We will see how he tries to release that when it comes time.
What's this mumbling? Just take your owneage like a man.
But until then his last effort was released on a label.
No kidding. I didn't say prior to his last album, did I?
Ok where is the sonic proof? There is none. We will see how he tries to release that when it comes time.
What's this mumbling? Just take your owneage like a man.
Where is the mumbling? Can you not understand english? There was no "owneage" whatsoever. Anyone can say something and be stretching truth's or fabricating something altogether. The truth is he won't break out of the label as you said until he releases something that was not done with the assistance of a label.
There was no "owneage" whatsoever.
The ownage lies with you running your yap, being proven wrong and then instead of saying "Oh, I was wrong", then pursuing the issue like I'm the clown-fool here.
Anyone can say something and be stretching truth's or fabricating something altogether.
Which is why I linked to it and also digg.com had 1550 diggs when the issue rose last week. Instead of attempting to educate yourself, you decided continue your wrongness.
QUOTE(theorgan @ Oct 15 2007, 10:01 PM)The truth is he won't break out of the label as you said until he releases something that was not done with the assistance of a label.
There was no "owneage" whatsoever.
The ownage lies with you running your yap, being proven wrong and then instead of saying "Oh, I was wrong", then pursuing the issue like I'm the clown-fool here.
Anyone can say something and be stretching truth's or fabricating something altogether.
Which is why I linked to it and also digg.com had 1550 diggs when the issue rose last week. Instead of attempting to educate yourself, you decided continue your wrongness.
The truth is he won't break out of the label as you said until he releases something that was not done with the assistance of a label.
Uh, yeah. I'm sure in the age of digital distribution, the man with a 20 year music career has no ability whatsoever to release something without a middleman taking a huge cut for very few services rendered. They could be working on a project for the next year independantly and you'll still be up in the air about it. How about we'll make it like this? If/when they sign with a new RIAA label, you can come back and talk trash to me. Until then, I'm right. kthxgbye
1. I was never wrong
2. Plenty of artists have said one thing and done another.
3. "How about we'll make it like this?" If/When he releases the new album independently, you can come back and talk trash to me. Until then, you are wrong.
1. I was never wrong
2. Plenty of artists have said one thing and done another.
3. "How about we'll make it like this?" If/When he releases the new album independently, you can come back and talk trash to me. Until then, you are wrong.
1. Yes you were. He is a "free agent" now with no current representation. This means he broke with the labels as I asserted.
2. So you know Reznors business better then Reznor? Do you have any personal insights on any other acts? TIA
3. Releasing an album isn't the only act designated as label territory. He could play a barroom, attend a supermarket opening or any number of things. It's still acting intependently without a label. What specifically about that do you not understand?
waaaahh, rant, etc