Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in '3DS - Flashcards & Custom Firmwares' started by loveugirls, Dec 31, 2014.
Sooo Sky3ds >> QQ3ds
Il buy one, I've got £2.80 pocket money to spend.
Hehe, I was joking about that, but like you never know, and tbh, they even copied the sky3ds 'list of features'
* First 3ds card to support all versions of 3ds/xl,2ds,new 3ds(xl/ll) (JP,US,EU)
* Compatible with newest V9.4.0-21 (include lower versions)
although if it is cheaper it will be a better deal then sky3ds
Too bad they couldn't figure out how to "JAM PACK ALL THE AWESOME FEATURES OF DS AND 3DS FLASHCART INTO ONE CARD USING AWESOME PATENT PENDING TECHNOLOGY!!!!!1"
Gateway can already play DS roms, use the Blue Card.
Seeing is believing - knowing how complex this would have to be I'm skeptical gamefan5.
this seems pretty cool to be honest. All of you guys are a bunch of Gateway fanboys. At the end of the day don't you just want to play vidya games? They all do the same thing.
Gateway has a lot of extra pormised features that they may one day experience, while Sky3DS has minimal features that work now.
It's very asymmetrical. Different strokes for different folks, and all that.
It's a sky clone with a generic R4 clone packed in. You could buy the same thing right now, I fail to see what's cool about it honestly.
this just seems a sky3ds knockoff (which could be nice if it was cheaper), but what had gateway to do with this??
Someone mentioned Gateway, and now people are going to start bickering back and fourth again about it.
This is one of those "you try it first" cards.
oh god, i am going to my shelter
If its not a gateway card, it has to be a piece of crap then right? (sarcasm)
The card is actually a piece of crap. A piece of clone-crap. Stop trying to blame fanboyism for common sense.
All they are doing is ripping off existing cards. It is not new. It is a clone.
You fail to see that one can call a copy-paste clone card what it actually is without being a blind Gateway fanboy.
seems pretty rare here though.
"qq" is an alternative to ";_;"