PS4 has 50% More Raw Power in Graphics than the Xbox One

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by EvilMakiPR, May 23, 2013.

?

PS4 or Xbox One for You?

  1. PS4

    61 vote(s)
    54.0%
  2. Xbox One

    7 vote(s)
    6.2%
  3. None

    45 vote(s)
    39.8%
  1. EvilMakiPR
    OP

    EvilMakiPR GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,250
    647
    Apr 9, 2013
    Vinnymac, Thug and yuyuyup like this.
  2. ComeTurismO

    ComeTurismO CTO

    Member
    2,944
    5,589
    Sep 18, 2011
    Canada
    4:54 PM
    I need a source for this, even though it is stated in the picture that it is stated that the PS4 has 50% more raw power in graphics than the Xbox one.
     
  3. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    pip Reporter
    23,668
    21,702
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    ...the source is right there in the OP?

    It's from Eurogamer.
     
  4. EvilMakiPR
    OP

    EvilMakiPR GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,250
    647
    Apr 9, 2013
    I think the source is there
     
  5. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Member
    10,254
    17,404
    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey
    Bam.
     
  6. soulx

    soulx GBAtemp Legend

    Member
    10,130
    4,709
    Apr 4, 2009
    Canada
    Lowest common denominator for multiplats is the Xbox One so really, this won't make much of a difference (aside from exclusives). Maybe slightly improved framerates and effects (kind of like what we've seen with 360 games vs. PS3).
     
    Snailface likes this.
  7. Snailface

    Snailface My frothing demand for 3ds homebrew is increasing

    Member
    4,324
    1,983
    Sep 20, 2010
    Engine Room with Cyan, watching him learn.
    50% may seem like a lot, but it's not enough difference to be significant in the world of graphics. (unless you're a nerd counting pixels and frames -- who is not representative of the general gaming population)
     
  8. JoostinOnline

    JoostinOnline Certified Crash Test Dummy

    Member
    10,974
    3,761
    Apr 2, 2011
    United States
    The Twilight Zone
    You know, those aren't the only three options.
     
  9. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    pip Reporter
    23,668
    21,702
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    50% is not a "counting pixels" sort of situation - both systems will display things at the same resolution, except one will calculate polygon-related maths faster and will be able to push more polygons quicker into much faster memory (GDDR5 versus DDR3).

    There's a number of variables making the PS4 a better system from a graphic's standpoint, not just the raw calculation power.

    The Wii U is bottom-tier in this regard, XBox One is the happy middle, PS4 sits comfortably at the top - there's no reason to argue against that.
     
    Riyaz and hhs like this.
  10. Chary

    Chary Never sleeps.

    pip Reporter
    GBAtemp Patron
    Chary is a Patron of GBAtemp and is helping us stay independent!

    Our Patreon
    4,489
    15,933
    Oct 2, 2012
    United States
    Both controllers look like they suck.
     
    Vinnymac likes this.
  11. EvilMakiPR
    OP

    EvilMakiPR GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,250
    647
    Apr 9, 2013


    About that. People are saying that Sony is lying about the RAM. Is that true?

    Well the question is Xbox One or PS4

    What other option can I add?
    Well I forgot 'Both'
     
  12. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    pip Reporter
    23,668
    21,702
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    Why would they lie about something they've officially announced in front of millions of people in February? Specs are subject to change, yes, but swapping GDDR5 for DDR3 is no easy task - they're different standards and it'd require re-designing the hardware. Swapping standards right now is not exactly an option - they might fiddle around with the CPU or GPU as those are all within the same standard but changing the memory means changing the memory control scheme. I highly doubt they'll back out of GDDR5 - if they would, it'd delay the release of the system quite a bit, I think.

    Pretty sure he's talking about the Wii U which is an in-betweener - Last Generation hardware in a Next Generation system. Its capabilities would've been impressive... 3-4 years ago. Right now it's way, way behind.
     
  13. JoostinOnline

    JoostinOnline Certified Crash Test Dummy

    Member
    10,974
    3,761
    Apr 2, 2011
    United States
    The Twilight Zone
    I actually find it rather sad that this will probably have a big affect on sales. So many people (especially teenagers) only care about graphics these days. Developers focus more on that now than gameplay or story, and we get good looking pieces of crap as a result.

    "Both" and "Neither" are better options than "None". "None" suggests you won't get any of the four consoles for this generation.
     
  14. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Member
    10,254
    17,404
    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey
    Because the most powerful always wins. Always. Like the Wii and PS2 or... oh.

    People have always cared about graphics and they've never been the deciding factor in console races past. This is hardly a new development, and it's not going to ruin gaming. There's no need to be upset.
     
    the_randomizer likes this.
  15. Snailface

    Snailface My frothing demand for 3ds homebrew is increasing

    Member
    4,324
    1,983
    Sep 20, 2010
    Engine Room with Cyan, watching him learn.
    The specifics of pixel-counts, polygons, or whatever is not what I'm arguing about. Its that a raw 50% increase in overall graphics performance is insignificant from the 'general impression' of a typical dudebro gamer. Think Xbox vs PS2, the former was much more powerful, but it wasn't a typical x8 generational leap in graphics so it didn't matter in market share.
     
  16. heartgold

    heartgold GBAtemp Psycho!

    Member
    4,354
    1,045
    Sep 11, 2009
    London
    I was calling 50% powerful since yesterday. Lol

    It's not just more bandwidth RAM the PS4 has, the raw power of the GPU is a monster. MS has settled for something in the middle.

    Some dev has said it could be a case of ps4 version running 60fps and X1 30fp. Expect PS4 exclusives to go beyond what X1 can offer. Perhaps demolish it if you can use the full power of the PS4.
     
  17. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    pip Reporter
    23,668
    21,702
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    Y'see, better hardware has the upper-hand even when you think it doesn't. Poor hardware allows you to create games with poor graphics and good... or bad stories. Good hardware allows you to create games with good graphics and good... or bad stories. See what I did there?*

    *Graphical capabilities are in no way connected with the developer's creativity. The PS3 is a powerhouse and it gave birth The Journey which was breath-taking to the point of winning a Grammy award for the best soundtrack for Visual Media, and that's just one example.

    ...please tell me you don't mean the OUYA? Or is it the Steambox* line?

    *Meaning HTPC's. Let's be frank here, it's not a console.

    Considering the amount of time it was on the market for it did pretty well. It had no chance to gain a huge slice of the market share because the market was already owned by the PS2 - why jump ships when you could play the same games on a system that was cheaper and already owned by everyone and their dog?

    This isn't something "unnoticable" either - one system will have twice the graphical prowess of the other, how is that "insignificant" to you?

    Moreover, it's not "just for dudebros" - you can make beautiful, compelling games that aren't shooters and do require great graphical prowess.

    I'd also like to add that GPU's are not used just for graphics these days - they handle physics calculations and perform other tasks which require floating point precision. It's not just about the graphics.
     
    Gahars likes this.
  18. JoostinOnline

    JoostinOnline Certified Crash Test Dummy

    Member
    10,974
    3,761
    Apr 2, 2011
    United States
    The Twilight Zone
    I didn't say it would decide who "wins". I said it would have a big affect. Lots of people bought a PS3/360 because it had better graphics than the Wii. Just because the Wii sold more doesn't mean the inferior graphics didn't have affect. Imagine how well the Wii would have done if it was on par with the PS360?

    And really, are you seriously telling me that graphics were as big of a deal for teenagers 15 years ago?
     
  19. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    pip Reporter
    23,668
    21,702
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    Imagine how well it would've performed if it wasn't designed to quickly cash-in on the technology that was developed for the Gamecube that was given a quick facelift and was pushed onto storeshelves? The WiiMote was originally patented as a Gamecube add-on, y'know - I've seen the sketches. The Wii's architecture is very much akin to the Gamecube's and that's no coincidence. ;)

    It went to the top thanks to the WiiMote's novelty and fantastic marketing, yes, but that's an exception, not a general rule.

    They were always a big deal? Since the dawn of computing?

    People jumped from Atari to the NES for the graphics, they jumped to the Genesis for the graphics, they jumped to the SNES for the graphics - don't fool yourself, graphics are important. If they weren't, we'd play PONG to this day.
     
  20. JoostinOnline

    JoostinOnline Certified Crash Test Dummy

    Member
    10,974
    3,761
    Apr 2, 2011
    United States
    The Twilight Zone
    Shocker, you only read part of my post. I clearly said "gameplay" (in fact, I mentioned that FIRST), but you didn't seem to notice that.

    You can't focus on everything. That's why it's rare to see a game that wins in all areas.

    I think the OUYA is ridiculous, but it's supposed to be a threat to Sony/MS/Nintendo. It's also a video game console.