Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Books, Music, TV & Movies' started by Satangel, Jan 5, 2012.
Now that is a horrible name.
In other news, members of Warner Bros. staff were caught setting large quantities of money on fire. When asked why they would do such a thing, one employee told us, "We just decided to cut out the middleman."
I'd watch it.
You'd watch it.
We'd all watch it.
300 was fucking awesome.
They kinda gave us a "YOU'LL BE SEEING A SEQUEL" ending at the end of 300 so a prequel sounds a bit silly, probably because there won't be 300 soldiers anyway. I thought the sequel would be called "10,000" or something and have 10,000 soldiers.
But 300 is a guilty pleasure of mine. It's just a complete guy action flick with very little substance but good action and I enjoyed it. I'd see a sequel provided it wasn't shit.
From what I've read this was confirmed about 4 or 5 months ago now, apparently they've only just registered a domain name but its still old news
I never liked 300, for those who like 300 hope they enjoy it. I won't see it though.
First Watchmen, now this?!
I mean I know why, $$$. Maybe we can just give them the money now so they won't film these.
why a prequel did they want gerald buttler back so bad, I mean the movie ended on a cliffhanger right whaterever I might check it out, the first was ok the fighting was great but besides that the rest was mediocre
What was wrong with Watchmen? It wasn't exactly accurate to the Graphic Novel but it was an alright move nonetheless.
Anyway, I liked 300. I will skip this movie b/c it will flop without Gerard Butler. He made the 300 popular.