Inspired by the success of the "Barry Trotter" series of Harry Potter parodies, I decided I might be thinking of contemplating writing my own.
Originally, I had envisioned a character named "Hairy Pothead", a mute stoner that was shipped off to an historic penitentiary facility and had all sorts of crazy adventures with the inmates (I got the idea after watching The Last Castle)
But the names "Harry/Hairy Pothead" already exist in some lame-ass parodies from other, less talented and presumably child-murdering homosensual people.
Therefore, I decided that if I were to write a a parody, it would be parody on the "concept and implementation" of Harry Potter instead of just the various incarnations of the franchise, and thus more of a satire than a parody. A name "Harry Butter" would be perfect to craft a satirical story dealing with the way the series was milked to death. However, "Hairy Butter" has the added benefit of communicating the vulgarity of some parts of the story to potential readers. But, there is some artist named "Hairy Butter" (no shit!) and thus I'm using it only unless that person complains, otherwise I'm switching to "Harry", IF I'm going through with it at all.
Here's the first paragraph which I wrote about ten minutes ago;
Obviously it's just a draft and therefore poorly constructed, but it gives you an idea of the tone of the book.
So, according to you, should I or should I don't (do it)?
Originally, I had envisioned a character named "Hairy Pothead", a mute stoner that was shipped off to an historic penitentiary facility and had all sorts of crazy adventures with the inmates (I got the idea after watching The Last Castle)
But the names "Harry/Hairy Pothead" already exist in some lame-ass parodies from other, less talented and presumably child-murdering homosensual people.
Therefore, I decided that if I were to write a a parody, it would be parody on the "concept and implementation" of Harry Potter instead of just the various incarnations of the franchise, and thus more of a satire than a parody. A name "Harry Butter" would be perfect to craft a satirical story dealing with the way the series was milked to death. However, "Hairy Butter" has the added benefit of communicating the vulgarity of some parts of the story to potential readers. But, there is some artist named "Hairy Butter" (no shit!) and thus I'm using it only unless that person complains, otherwise I'm switching to "Harry", IF I'm going through with it at all.
Here's the first paragraph which I wrote about ten minutes ago;
QUOTE said:Hairy Butter and The Magical Milkcow
The gleaming sun shining through the rolled-up condom on the floor next to Hairy Butter's bed
was the first sparkle of light of a new day which he saw upon coming to senses.
A reminder of what he had done the night previously, the piece of rubber with an elongated tip and
coated profusely with vaginal grease smiled mockingly in his direction. He smelled the sweat mix of penile protein
and cheap Turkish carpet and several memories of his childhood came rushing through his still-dreamy mind.
With a swift jerk of his legs, Hairy was back on his feet. He refused to let the somnolence take
over and force him to miss the train to Hogwash and convinced himself that he was as fit as ever and the
unrelinquishing straining that occurred last night did not happen. He could not afford to arrive late at
Hogwash's School For Marketing-induced Misery this year, not when recalling what had happened during this past summer.
Hairy glanced at the Plutonium-powered Hairlessness Clock he inherited from his favorite
uncle Seriously Whack, and recalled his last words of advice before being decapitated publically
by a policeman for possession of Narcotics during a southern-whore scavangerhunt in Texas
"Don't be no goddamn shizzle ya dig? Be gettin' up earlier ya hear? Sleep is the cousin of death! Wordup!"
and decided that it was best to start packing immediately after breakfast even though the train would
not depart before noon.
Obviously it's just a draft and therefore poorly constructed, but it gives you an idea of the tone of the book.
So, according to you, should I or should I don't (do it)?
