EDIT: Redacted as the staff now edited the post, well done!
According to the article he chose to give it back to the store to try to make sure his friend didn't get fired. I suppose that's not directly Nintendo taking his game, yes, but it still leads to him not having it. I'll agree on the front page-worthiness though.How is this a front page-worthy post? It's a blatant copy-paste with no original input (forbidden by the staff some time back), the formatting is all over the place and the original hotlinks are still there, not to mention that half of it is pure conjuncture and the owner of the leaked copy may very well release more material because why shouldn't he? He legally purchased the game and can do whatever the hell he feels like doing with it and there's nothing Nintendo can do to stop him - the lack of fresh screenshots could be coincidental.
According to the article he chose to give it back to the store to try to make sure his friend didn't get fired. I suppose that's not directly Nintendo taking his game, yes, but it still leads to him not having it. I'll agree on the front page-worthiness though.
A matter of a vile principle. The very idea of street dates, delayed launches etc. is wholly repulsive to me. You have something ready to bring to the market, then bring it to the market. The game is finished, it is out in stores, people could buy it if you let them. And why? So that everyone is treated equally? Yes, nobody is being treated better than you, but if you look only at yourself, you are still, even if you were in the last area to be supplied, getting it worse than without a limitation. And choosing whether to view spoilers is your own freaking responsibility, not something the creator of the work should have to do for you.It's not a matter of plot or anything, it's a matter of principle, if you can't understand that, there's a problem.
So the games can be reviewed?Ughh... Why does gamefreak even give free review copies. -_- thats just freaking stupid because you cant trust anyone
So the games can be reviewed?
after reading the source and the source of the source, I have a hard time believing if this actually happened or just the guy spinning bs to get attention
If they wanted to sue, they'd only be able to sue the store that broke street date, for the guy bought it legally with his money. No one made him sign a waiver that could've stopped him from leaking.
Not sure you know what that meme means........-snip-
Not sure you know what that meme means........