I just read that article, and like so many retarded Internet-based critics, the author is piling his crap on something he doesn't know the first thing about.
Quote: "Just look at that DS cover: it appears to be a severed buttock with two arm-conjoined siamese twins dancing on the hump. More curious is the motto: 'Lost in Blue'. Yet they are dancing on a flesh-tone. Perhaps a more accurate illustration of the entire 'what the fuck does that even mean' concept of being lost in blue would have simply been blue siamese twins painted on a blue cover."
Right. A person who doesn't know that Lost in blue is a DS game, that the logo has two children holding hands, and that the "blue" is supposed to represent the ocean, in the middle of which the kids are stranded, on a tiny island, can just as well shut up before proving him/herself a moronic hypocrite by criticising any of it. His/her jokes suddenly stop being so funny.
Yet another example of how easy it is to mock something you know nothing about, in front of a herd of even more ignorant, even more retarded "fans".
I bet he/she's feeling all smug and smart, having piled his/her crap over somebody's work, and then spreading it evenly with his/her attempts at satire.
Good for him/her.
Asshole.
(Him/her because not only men are retarded. And I don't care what sex the thing that writes those articles claims to be.)