Open-world gaming, the new trend?

Discussion in 'General Gaming Discussion' started by soulx, Jun 13, 2013.

  1. soulx
    OP

    soulx GBAtemp Legend

    Member
    10,130
    4,708
    Apr 4, 2009
    Canada
    [​IMG]

    - The Witcher 3
    - Dead Rising 3
    - The Crew
    - Dying Light
    - Dragon Age
    - FF XV
    - Infamous
    - Mad Max
    - MGS V
    - Watch Dogs
    - The Division
    - Need for Speed: Rivals
    - Monolith Soft's 'X'
    - Mirror's Edge 2

    thoughts?
     
    KingVamp likes this.


  2. Narayan

    Narayan desu~

    Member
    2,921
    825
    Sep 29, 2010
    This sounds fun. I like open-world since I've spent a lot of time in MMORPGs.
    Open world gaming is better with mupltiplayer and lots of content.
     
    Ammako likes this.
  3. Ethevion

    Ethevion Wannabe Artist

    Member
    1,783
    802
    Sep 23, 2010
    Canada
    I don't mind it. The Crew, FF XV, MGS V, and X are all appealing to me. The crew is especially appealing because it's open world.
     
  4. weavile001

    weavile001 Spiritmaster

    Member
    2,796
    837
    Jun 10, 2012
    Brazil
    somewhere
    wait, The Witcher 3 is Open World?
    FACK YEA!

    i think the open world makes you explore more places out of order, obviously.
     
    Satangel likes this.
  5. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    pip Reporter
    23,558
    21,535
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    I don't really see it as a new trend, rather new nomenclature. Sandbox games are nothing new, really. ;)
     
  6. GameWinner

    GameWinner Take your heart

    Member
    4,190
    1,689
    Jun 14, 2009
    United States
    Great! Keep them coming.
     
  7. SickPuppy

    SickPuppy New Member

    Member
    1,789
    451
    Jul 29, 2009
    United States
    not a big fan of rail shooters, much rather have open world.
     
  8. Sterling

    Sterling GBAtemp's Silver Hero

    Member
    4,023
    645
    Jan 22, 2009
    United States
    Texas
    I'm definitely a fan of open world games. It's the natural evolution of gaming. Before you could only fit so much narrative in a linear plot. Now you can fit a more encompassing world with many different peoples and histories. To the player it's just like reading a choose your own adventure book, and it's much more rewarding to go out and learn about an immersive world without any real worries (ie don't have to follow the main quest if you don't want to). Sandboxing is an amazing way of getting the player to feel the grandness of the world.
     
  9. air2004

    air2004 Air

    Member
    1,621
    452
    Oct 24, 2008
    United States
    Anytown
    Open world does have it's difficulties ....
     
  10. Sterling

    Sterling GBAtemp's Silver Hero

    Member
    4,023
    645
    Jan 22, 2009
    United States
    Texas
    In terms of development, or consumer level presentation?
     
  11. Pedeadstrian

    Pedeadstrian GBAtemp's Official frill-necked lizard.

    Member
    3,525
    1,564
    Oct 12, 2012
    United States
    Sandy Eggo
    Open world = more freedom and choices. It's great. Especially when there's no stupid, invisible walls.
     
  12. xxing28
    This message by xxing28 has been removed from public view by Costello, Jun 13, 2013.
    Jun 13, 2013
  13. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Member
    10,254
    17,403
    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey
    I certainly like a good open world game, but it has its fair share of problems. It's incredibly difficult to create open worlds that feel like they'e alive; most just feel like hollow, lifeless expanses. It becomes an albatross around the game's neck, an annoying slog that needlessly drags out the experience. Open worlds can also make it all the more difficult to maintain the cohesiveness, direction, and pacing of a story in check.

    "Linear" is all too often thrown around as a dirty word, and I think that's a mistake. It isn't less advanced or interesting than the (sometimes hollow) freedom an open world provides. Would The Walking Dead or Spec Ops: The Line's stories have been improved if you had to wander around between important scenes? I don't think so.

    If developers can create meaningful open worlds, more power to them. If they're arbitrarily expanding the map size because that's the hip thing to do, however, then they're just shooting themselves in the foot.
     
  14. Sterling

    Sterling GBAtemp's Silver Hero

    Member
    4,023
    645
    Jan 22, 2009
    United States
    Texas
    It is a dirty word in my mind. The model that has worked fine for so long has lost its luster. The lack of lively world mechanics is not a product of poor design, but a physical limitation. You're only given so much to work with. Only so much memory to cram words, textures and personalities into the scene.
     
  15. IBNobody

    IBNobody I try to keep myself amused.

    Member
    1,127
    189
    Nov 16, 2006
    United States
    Texas, Hang 'Em High

    I agree 100%. I'll take a linear game with a good story over an open world any day. As you said, open worlds dilute the storyline.

    They also often penalize you for not exploring every nook and cranny, and they tend to do it more than closed world games. Because I didn't talk to a specific NPC in a remote area at exactly 7:49 AM, I miss out on a huge quest arc, an uber-powerful item, or a key recruit. The completionist in me groans whenever this happens.
     
  16. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Member
    10,254
    17,403
    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey
    Again, I wouldn't say that. Linearity isn't just a gameplay model - it's a narrative choice, a choice of scope. If you want a tight, concise story, for example, an open world is a needless distraction.

    Just because we can have games with wide, expansive worlds doesn't mean every game should.


    Not necessarily. Those limitations can have an impact, sure, but they're not the end all, be all. You can work within your limitations and still deliver a world that's still fun to engage in. An open world doesn't have to look lifelike to feel alive .

    Rockstar, for example, is a developer that understands this. Even the PS2 GTA games offered cities with personality and flavor, filled to the brim with fun activities to engage in. Hell, some of my best memories from the games were just parking in a quiet section of the city and listening to the radio.
     
  17. Sterling

    Sterling GBAtemp's Silver Hero

    Member
    4,023
    645
    Jan 22, 2009
    United States
    Texas
    I see your point. Perhaps this is just me then. I think I've been addicted to getting as much out of my games as an MMO. Spending a lot of money on a game that will last me ten hours at most seems like a waste compared to the games that give me two hundred or more. Linear is just a turn off at this point since the key word to me is 'replayability'.
     
  18. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Member
    10,254
    17,403
    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey

    I get what you're saying; I get wanting to get the most bang for your buck. Still, I'd personally prefer a shorter but meaningful experience (like Spec Ops or TWD, as I mentioned before - both are around 10 hours or so, but man, what an amazing 10 hours) than a game that's needlessly padded out.
     
  19. BORTZ

    BORTZ Don't pretend you aren't impressed

    Supervisor
    11,642
    14,515
    Dec 2, 2007
    United States
    Pittsburgh
    I usually have pretty big problems with "open world" games. I tend to get lost, miss things, or bored in open world enviroments. Because like Gahars said, most of them feel hollow. I do no like games that make me run from A to B to do something that has little bearing on the story. Or advancing the gameplay.

    Most of the time when i see the "open world" invite, i usually tend to file that under "do not play"
     
    EZ-Megaman likes this.
  20. Lilith Valentine

    Lilith Valentine GBATemp's Wolfdog™ Spooky cute.

    Member
    20,079
    21,210
    Sep 13, 2009
    Antarctica
    Between insane and insecure
    Old trend is old. The last generation you couldn't swing a dead cat without hitting an open-world game.
    It's not a bad thing though since they are really fun, but my only gripe about them is that I rarely ever finish one. Which kinda makes them feel less rewarding. That's just my opinion though.
     
  21. Guild McCommunist

    Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Member
    18,151
    10,466
    May 6, 2009
    United States
    The Danger Zone
    I thought this E3 was Year of the Car.

    Literally every conference showed a realistic car racing game minus Nintendo (which technically was a Nintendo Direct and not a conference so I'll keep my record).

    Not just car racers, but like people getting grotesquely into the details of cars. Like basically blowing their load over the fiber in the seats.