Occultist and Researcher Jordan Maxwell: The Awakening

[The Catboy]

I am not watching a video with a thumbnail that is literally mocked by memes. I know it’s conspiracy garbage without needing to watch it.

 

[notimp]

You are right, it's all a coincidence, no planning involved at all, just free radicals.

Well no - there are the good complexity reductions

- like when in the world driven by data, video above, its obviously good to say, that Russia should get over that national pride thing, because other countries 'got over it'

- And there the obvious bad complexity reductions, like - when Merkel and Putin talk every week, thats obviously bad - because talking, I mean - seriously? Look at all the data we've got.

- Or the good complexity reductions, when the NSA does a full take on internet data, but then is oblivious to the attack on the capitol - which means we need more targeted executive power with private companies, to close down all planning after such an attack, by killing 70.000 QAnon accounts at once.

- And there is the bad complexity reduction, when f.e. Snowden leaked part of that information.

So we are constantly exchanging stories about what realities we live in - and they are picked up, and dropped based on partisan believes. Being able to stick to partisan believes, is something that guarantees your career is made. Being able to suppress diverging views is 'protecting democracy' from an outside attack.

- Bashing mexicans and telling people, some proud boys are good people too, is obviously good, when it serves a purpose, and obviously bad once its done serving a purpose


So what purpose does your story serve? For the time being. The great plan is good, when its religious, but bad, when its religious in that other, bad way? The great plan is unfailable? The master manipulators are the others? Order is bliss? Moving people against a certain order is necessity?

Just explain yourself for once.

Giving people hope, by making stuff simple. Or by giving them a focal point, that stops them thinking past a certain point? Spreading religious motives is good, because it shows how bad other people are? Sperading religious motives is good, because people need them to not constantly stare at stuff being made up?

People should ignore symbolism, when they dont need it - but flock to it, when they need it?

People should just see the truth for what it is? And only go for symbolism?

But one thing is sure - you are primarily helping, by posting those ankers, and then hide behind you cant prove that the opposite of what is said in those videos is not true - and that bliss isnt needed in the world.

So again, is it helping? Is it promoting (/recruiting)? Is it riling people up. Is it 'seeing the truth'. Is it understanding that people need believes? And for what purpose.

 

[notimp]

I am not watching a video with a thumbnail that is literally mocked by memes. I know it’s conspiracy garbage without needing to watch it.

But at the same time, you'd probably say - that this is ok:
https://www.dw.com/en/nature-childhood-child-planet-environment/a-56160205

So is holding a discussion around election results based on "faith" and "acceptance" based motives:
https://www.dw.com/en/can-americans-have-faith-in-their-electoral-system/a-55274511

And besides being conspiracy garbage it (the symbolism this thread is about) is also something else - because it is promoted in popular art - f.e. and some people will go for it, if they need it.

 

[The Catboy]

But at the same time, you'd probably say - that this is ok:
https://www.dw.com/en/nature-childhood-child-planet-environment/a-56160205

And besides being conspiracy garbage its also something else - because it is promoted in popular art - f.e. and some people will go for it, if they need it.

I am not entirely sure what you are getting at with this post. I am sorry, but I am judging a book by it’s cover. Maybe something is actually worth a damn in the video or maybe it’s all garbage, maybe when I feel more ambitious I will give it a watch.

 

[notimp]

I am not entirely sure what you are getting at with this post. I am sorry, but I am judging a book by it’s cover. Maybe something is actually worth a damn in the video or maybe it’s all garbage, maybe when I feel more ambitious I will give it a watch.

Then this is good:
https://www.dw.com/en/china-must-play-by-international-trade-rules/av-56220209

and this is good?
https://www.dw.com/en/china-us-trade-war-eu/a-56212728

Im getting at, that you also make judgements based on complexity reductions and believes. Because of stories.

But not the ones that are mocked.

(Also - if you want to keep with the motive -- both of the positions in those two articles are part of a greater plan?

We cant let china destroy international trade - and
we are entirely unprepaired if the US does it, but dont want to comment?

Both articles posted by the same media outlet - just hours apart?)
--

Also that symbolism is promoted in contemporary popular art.

see:

What does the eye symbol in Netflix’s A Series of Unfortunate Events mean
https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/drama...netflixs-a-series-of-unfortunate-events-mean/

And if you want to get a faint idea as to why - at least partly, I suggest you watch the 'mood' of those works of art.

edit:

Fresh out on the 'occult awakening', oh sorry I mean depressing - story line: The Ukraine finance minister just petitioned the EU, that they would need financial aid. Part of the pitch - so important that you find it in the subheader of the article is, that he still remains against North Stream 2.
https://www.derstandard.at/story/20...nzminister-wir-brauchen-mehr-hilfe-von-der-eu (german)

Thats also part of the bigger plan? Part of the awakening?

edit: Background to why the Ukraine is against North Stream 2: https://www.dw.com/en/nord-stream-2-ukraine-united-states-lng-poland-fracking/a-54303274
---

Here is another gem - but first - welcome Matt Damon, everyone!

Social entrepreneurship, for companies investing, is more than just CSR - you are also educating the consumer - on feeling good about buying the product. (By maybe recognizing its for water.org)
Yeah, yeah, yeah...

But look at all the feels you can get when you help people in need (intrinsic motivation), by nudging the market, through a concept that simply pays because of increased productivity!

How come that (the 'paying for itself because you are investing in people' part) has not been a major line of planning in developed economies over the past decade? Oh yeah, yeah... I see. Nothing so much occult about that.

 

[notimp]

Maybe this helps:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-the-uk/adam-curtis-explains-it-all

Audio version (read by an Ivona TTS voice), if you are more into listening rather than reading:
https://vocaroo.com/1h7TOk9LzAcp

For some reason I had a strong association to this thread, when reading the text.