nyone else think our last rview was biased?

corbs132

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2004
Messages
846
Trophies
0
XP
276
Country
United States
It looked like it came straight out of maxconsole, saying how great it is, with features that are in 99% of slot-1s being praised as if never before seen? I honestly think the crd deserves a 7 at MOST. Not a single game works with downlod play! If I am wrong, correct me. This is just what I got out of the lat review.
 

shaunj66

GBAtemp Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Messages
11,789
Trophies
4
Age
38
Location
South England
Website
www.gbatemp.net
XP
21,354
Country
United Kingdom
No other cart except the Acekard has true 100% compatibility with no bugs/slowdowns. And rarely does any cart support download play properly.

The Acekard scored 7.5 with its 100% compatibility, the reason it scored 1 point lower than the UFPEX is because it requires you to format your micro SD card with a proprietary file system severely crippling ease of use for your micro SD card. The Acekard software also inhibited other bugs and problems that randomly formatted the cart.

The UFPEX boasts 100% compatibility, FAT32 support, nice(ish) GUI, drag and drop (though somewhat slow), DLDI support and a cheap price tag. It does its job perfectly. But certain problems just prevent it from being on par with other slot 1 solutions such as the R4.

I think for what the UFPEX offers; it deserves the 8.5 score.
 

shaunj66

GBAtemp Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Messages
11,789
Trophies
4
Age
38
Location
South England
Website
www.gbatemp.net
XP
21,354
Country
United Kingdom
k. I stand corrected. Apologies from me to the review writer.
lol. You're welcome to your opinion. It only helps us better ourselves in the future.
smile.gif


I'm not telling you what to believe; rather giving my opinion on what you brought up.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
    Skelletonike @ Skelletonike: wth happened during lunch break?