going back to the nfl. why dont these players protest and ban other players when it comes to domestic violence and other crimes?
wow. nice. so you are now implying that all blacks do domestic violence and crimes?
going back to the nfl. why dont these players protest and ban other players when it comes to domestic violence and other crimes?
please please don't feed himwow. nice. so you are now implying that all blacks do domestic violence and crimes?
you're right because that's not what I said
I think it's pretty fucking disingenuous to imply that because a quantitative observation is not present there's suddenly no argument. I've never said it would reduce anything by a specific amount, I said it would essentially make people think twice before doing any stupid shit like that. People who don't value their lives won't be stopped by it, no shit.
You must be a barbarian because you both have one thing in common: you're both illiterate, and that's racist.
To shoot to kill, duh.What do you think "shoot to kill" means?
"deterrent - a thing that discourages or is intended to discourage someone from doing something." Yep, so me giving out ice cream to stop violent crime is a deterrent. Which is better? My plan or your "shoot to kill" plan? Don't want a quantitative comparison? Gosh, I wonder why people don't want to adopt your plan when you can only back it up with "intent".
I have no idea what you're saying here, but okay, whatever.
To shoot to kill, duh.
Let's check your reading comprehension. What situation was I saying justified a shot to kill?A policy of "shoot to kill" means to choose killing over incapacitation. It does not mean to choose killing as a necessity of incapcitation if the situation arises. To place that power upon the police is to put within them the power to try and convict people upon their own judgment and carry out a death sentence. That is barbarism in a system of laws that separates judgment of punishment from that punishment precisely because placing that power in the hands of one person is such a corrupting, corrosive force that it destroys civil society.
But, yea, whatever. Must all be mad because I'm not taking my "meds".
What situation was I saying justified a shot to kill?
And what do you define as an active shooter?An active shooter. You have decided to place it upon police to judge that person is an active shooter, that they may then condemn that active shooter to death, and then they should execute that active shooter.
And what do you define as an active shooter?
You know... There are so many other jobs where the people doing them put their life on the line, and somehow they manage not to shoot anyoneyou guys act like 'whites' cops eat donuts all day and shoot blacks on site, disregarding that they put their life on the line everyday. not to mention all the crime scenes and disputes and emergencies they have to go through.
in the nfl they kneel for who knows what but wont say something when their QB is a serial rapist or their guy punched out a chick... its why the nfl is dead because very few really care. dont mix politics outside of politics
You know... There are so many other jobs where the people doing them put their life on the line, and somehow they manage not to shoot anyone
And besides, if a police officer's job is to "protect and serve" the community, you can't afford to have their judgement impared by getting tired from crime scenes, disputes, and various emergencies, as you imply. If they can't do what the job demands, they're by definition unfit
you guys act like 'whites' cops eat donuts all day and shoot blacks on site, disregarding that they put their life on the line everyday. not to mention all the crime scenes and disputes and emergencies they have to go through.
in the nfl they kneel for who knows what but wont say something when their QB is a serial rapist or their guy punched out a chick... its why the nfl is dead because very few really care. dont mix politics outside of politics
this is the problem and this is why they kneel
So basically what you're saying is a hypothetical scenario is bad because of something completely unrelated to it: crooked people and corrupt leaders letting their underlings do whatever and get away with it.The question is, what does the police officer consider to be an active shooter? It is he who is the one who will be executing people. Will you accept his judgment? What will be the punishment when he is wrong? Nothing about how police who current shoot and kill people with less verifiable justification make me believe any policy that codifies "shoot to kill an active shooter" will be used for merely that purpose accurately or necessarily. It is not enough to introduce hypotheticals that under any sort of examination of application are almost certainly to fail miserably not only in their intended effect (a deterrent) but also in their application (only in the scope of active shooters).
If you think that taking meds would in some fashion calm me to be oblivious to this, then I'm sad to tell you I won't take my soma.
Yeah can I just like remind everyone this is the guy who bases his experience with black on black crime on a fucking parody of hood dramas?maybe you should tell them why they should kneel because 99.9% of the players dont know why to kneel or refuse to kneel because the pay is too good.
So basically what you're saying is a hypothetical scenario is bad because of something completely unrelated to it: crooked people and corrupt leaders letting their underlings do whatever and get away with it.
Yeah I think I can totally see why you're on meds now.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Yeah can I just like remind everyone this is the guy who bases his experience with black on black crime on a fucking parody of hood dramas?
But you weren't old enough for the early 00s and all you've said is stupid shit. You're literally basing this shit off a fucking parody that grossly exaggerates reality or flat out lies about it in favor of comedy. I can tell you aren't black, nor that you've ever lived in such a time period, let alone in any ghetto. Check your shit at the front door, champ.just because its made into a comedy doesnt make the other 95% of it not based on real behaviors. sure its not as bad today, but if your old enough and saw how the early 90s were you wouldnt say stupid shit
I'm confused as to what your point is. If you're saying that seeing "violent stuff" is a good excuse for shooting unarmed civilians then... No, it objectively isn't. If you're saying that by comparison, shooting someone isn't even the worst part of their job, then... What? Otherwise, it really just looks like you're throwing shit and hoping it looks like an argumentyour disregarding all the violent stuff they seen and gone through. they're human being too
But you weren't old enough for the early 00s and all you've said is stupid shit. You're literally basing this shit off a fucking parody that grossly exaggerates reality or flat out lies about it in favor of comedy. I can tell you aren't black, nor that you've ever lived in such a time period, let alone in any ghetto. Check your shit at the front door, champ.
