- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,345
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 34
- Location
- California
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 1,043
- Country
I'm not saying that I agree with Mr. Rodriguez here (I absolutely don't), but I think people are using a pretty weak argument to dismiss his claims.
I don't know, the whole, "You can't judge X unless you have reached X's level of success/training/etc," just bugs me. You don't have to be a chef to tell when the food is bad, and a film critic is perfectly suited to judge a movie without needing to make one him/herself.
While that is true to some extent, we gotta remember that those are merely opinions and not facts. However, my point here being is that since Kojima has proven himself to be successful among his fans and the population in general. Mr. Rodriguez doesn't really have any basis to claim that the guy sucks. Sure he may not like him, but the way he said it made him sound like he's above Kojima's level.
Of course has the basis to say that Kojima sucks; that's his opinion. The amount of success and fans under Kojima's belt doesn't change that.
Of course he's entitled to his own opinion, but what really bugged me about what he said was that he's saying it like it's a fact. He says Metal Gear is good in spite of Kojima, not because of him. He also doesn't offer any explanations to back up his opinion either about why he thinks Kojima sucks, which kind of leads us to believe he just outright hate the man for no good reason.
Kojima's success does show that he is decent if not good at what he does. If he wasn't, no one would play or buy his games.