- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,434
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Wouldn't YOU like to know?
- Website
- gbatemp.net
- XP
- 2,707
- Country
I read the research article [PDF] on this a year ago. I wouldn't get too optimistic, yet. It only targets 90%.
As good as 90% sounds, it leaves 10% of cancer cells impervious to the vaccine. Those 10% will eventually grow to repopulate the cancer patient.
The difficulty with curing cancer is that if even 1% of the cells is left alive, they'll just grow back again. That's why oncologists have to use multiple methods (various methods of chemotherapy + radiation) to fight cancer in one patient. They just hope that if one method misses a few cancer cells, the other methods will pick off the remaining surviving cells. It works sometimes.
As good as 90% sounds, it leaves 10% of cancer cells impervious to the vaccine. Those 10% will eventually grow to repopulate the cancer patient.
The difficulty with curing cancer is that if even 1% of the cells is left alive, they'll just grow back again. That's why oncologists have to use multiple methods (various methods of chemotherapy + radiation) to fight cancer in one patient. They just hope that if one method misses a few cancer cells, the other methods will pick off the remaining surviving cells. It works sometimes.