Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'GBAtemp & Scene News' started by TPi, Mar 10, 2006.
Zomg why is the euro box art cooler then the us one xD
because... well... i'm sorry you have to hear it that way... if i were you i would take a seat... now here it comes...
the european people are much cooler and we have the euro, thats why!
i saw that coming from-a mile away
ZOMGGG WE UUROP3Z ARE KEWL D3WDDDD. GTFO MY SERVAR BEFURR I TEL ADM1NZ!@!
Yes, you Europeans are "much cooler and you guys have euros," because that's a legitimate excuse. Nice. You win a cookie. kthx?
Euro box art is cooler than the us but the game is still crap like the us.
The Euro sucks, and you know it.
*Hides cos he knows hes wrong.
Don't worry, we get the non-shitty Mega Man title screens!
Umm...yeah, I'm from canada. 'Nuff said.
I'm still doubting, wether I should purchase this game or not... Is it that bad?
Is is bad.Stay away from it.
The only good rpg is mario and luigi that is in english .
I hope more english rpg come for ds.
Meh, I liked the GBA Lunar, so is this one better or worse?
for lunar gba :: average score is 79%
nds lunar :: average score falls at 59% :S
personally back on the mega cd days i loved lunar 1 and 2, as well as the various ports, including the great gba one (imo).
this one doesn't seem to have been made by games arts, well at least there are several other company names mentioned on the box. i played it for just a very few mins, seemed pretty bad to me - and by looking at the scores it has been getting in reviews i didn't find the motivation to give it more chance. yet i'm a game arts / lunar fan, but as skarthebloodchild said, better staying away from this one i think -- unfortunately
Okay, won't buy it then... sad though, how they managed to fuck it up.
i think the anwser is simple, called 'Marvellous Interactive Inc.'
seems like they did develop it, and not game arts
btw the upcoming ys strategy is made by marvellous .. looks damn crappy, uhhhh
Not quite. Marvellous Interactive Inc. is merely the JP publisher (in conjunction with Atari in EU) while this was solely published by UbiSoft in NA.
Sad to say it, but this train-wreck was indeed developed by GameArts by most of the same people who did Lunar 1 and Lunar 2. Not sure how they managed to get so far off track with this one, but you can safely blame GA for it's crappiness.
ah i wasn't sure, and couldn't believe game arts was responsible of that crap
thanks for the info Orbiting234!
Since game arts was bought buy enix and square they do only crap... ah almost true, but as good as their game are they are very limited compared to the old one (way too linear usually)... i remember in 1998 when they said to working designs "sorry none of the actual console can support lunar 3 and if it doesn't show up on dc soon you can expect it for the next gen"
well we are at the next next gen and we obtain this.... it's too bad to destroy such a legend of the rpg... euro version anyway and at least the title is in the spirit of the serie....