NDS not capable of better GFX?

Discussion in 'NDS - Console and Game Discussions' started by Fabis94, Jan 5, 2009.

Jan 5, 2009
  1. Fabis94
    OP

    Member Fabis94 Xbawx playa

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    847
    Country:
    Latvia
    I'm simply curious why didn't they make the new DSi capable of better GFX (like a PSP)? I mean let's say they made a mistake when they released the normal NDS and then saw PSP has better graphics. So why don't they now make it like that? It's just simply stupid. They are losing money.

    P.S Im a DS fan so i'm not ranting about it. Just if DSi gfx capability would be a little better than DS and DSlite, i would be happier.
     


  2. Evilmaster1985

    Member Evilmaster1985 GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    456
    Location:
    Middle of nowhere
    Country:
    United States
    Guess Nintendo did not want to dissapoint the NDS(L) users by making a system way more powerfull that runs far better games not compatible with the NDS(L).

    Indeed to bad [​IMG]

    But now atleast we will have more people to play with on the wifi [​IMG]

    Greetz, Vistabuser.
     
  3. silverbullet1080

    Member silverbullet1080 GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    294
    Country:
    Canada
    Because then DSi games wouldn't work on a DS, durr. The DSi is an upgrade to the DS Lite the same way the DS Lite was an upgrade to the DS Fat, its not the next generation, its not the DS2. And how did they make a mistake when the PSP had better graphics? They're not losing money on anything. Do a bit a research before you make a silly post like that.
     
  4. Ferrariman

    Member Ferrariman Hip-Flop and cRap

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,357
    Location:
    Canader.
    Country:
    Canada
    Because Nintendo has mastered the art of making underpowered hardware sell like crazy.

    The next handheld from nintendo will probably have graphics nearing the Gamecube.

    But when sony makes a new handheld, it will have graphics that are better than the PS2 (I don't think near PS3.)
     
  5. Hop2089

    Member Hop2089 Cute>Hot

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    3,810
    Country:
    United States
    Most DSi owners already owned a DS or DSL so there is no difference and the DSi should have been made with better graphics capability to lure in new gamers to Nintendo.
     
  6. Joey R.

    Banned Joey R. Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    291
    Location:
    Oviedo, Asturias
    Country:
    Spain
    Well, it doesn't look like you're not ranting...
     
  7. Fabis94
    OP

    Member Fabis94 Xbawx playa

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    847
    Country:
    Latvia
    Geez i was just asking why did they do such a thing...if it sounded like a rant then i'm sorry, it wasn't meant to sound like one.
     
  8. apb407

    Member apb407 GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    496
    Country:
    United States
    Welcome to GBAtemp !

    I understand where you are coming from but again like everybody is saying it would not be fair for older ds phat and ds lite owners if the newer DSi had better graphic capabilities. Now then this theory would be completely thrown away if they start releasing DSi only games because then i believe they could have had a better GFX system because older owners would have to buy the new DSi for the exclusives.

    Edit: Also for the people flaming him the DS is losing some money on the fact that some stupid gamers buy systems only for graphics yes i know the DS is murdering the PSP but there are still many people who either say the DS is too "kiddy" for them or the graphics suck so in a certain way they are losing some consumers.
     
  9. Edgedancer

    Member Edgedancer Director of Moon based operations

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,641
    Location:
    Canberra
    Country:
    Australia
    They simply did not want to alienate the rest of the DS user base.
     
  10. p1ngpong

    Supervisor p1ngpong Legit Boss Harold

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    6,296
    Location:
    DS Scene
    Country:
    Croatia
    Why would they want to spend money on developing better more powerful hardware, when they could just re-package the same old thing, remove useful functions (GBA), put some cheap useless functions in it, and watch it sell like mad?

    Nintendo love to sell people the same thing ten times over and watch them lap it up.
     
  11. Law

    Member Law rip ninjacat that zarcon made me

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    4,132
    Location:
    ‭jerkland
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Protip: Not everybody has the money for a new handheld right now, and making the DSi more powerful so any new games made for it wouldn't work on the regular DS/DSl would probably piss off a lot of people.

    Not to mention it's nothing but a goddamn gimmick.
     
  12. taken

    Member taken GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2008
    Messages:
    520
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I am glad that i bought ds lite. I am not bothered buying a dsi sorry.
     
  13. Joey R.

    Banned Joey R. Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    291
    Location:
    Oviedo, Asturias
    Country:
    Spain
    Revise your definition of "flaming", please -- it's completely wrong. The DS is not only "murdering" the PSP, it has sold more than 84 million units around the world. How on Earth would you consider that "losing money"? The success of the DS is based, mostly, on its casual-gaming nature. Instead of focusing in graphics and all that, Nintendo opted for a "everyone-can-play" handheld. So far, so good. And that doesn't mean at all that it's kiddy... if someone thinks so, then that someone should educate himself before speaking. The ratio for customers lost:customers gained with that move is like 1:90000, even if you don't want to admit it. Nintendo is not losing money at all.
     
  14. pokeparadox

    Member pokeparadox GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    207
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I tend to agree they could have put a GFX chip that could render DS games at a slightly higher resolution and smooth over the textures... but there's kinda no point. It wasn't their goal when they created the DSi...
     
  15. nvidia5500

    Newcomer nvidia5500 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    18
    Country:
    United States
    @Fabis94: I do own both a dslite and psp. DS is not all about the graphics. If graphics is what you want then don't fabricate things like Nintendo loosing money yadda yadda and just buy a goddamn psp [​IMG]
    But once you understand the true purpose of the DS, you're gonna love it more than the PSP hehe.

    LoZ: Phantom Hourglass anyone? [​IMG]
     
  16. spinal_cord

    Member spinal_cord Knows his stuff

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,871
    Location:
    somewhere
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I grew up in the 80's, so like some of the older games, I know that fancy graphics DO NOT make a game.
    Nintendo have tried (and succeeded) to remember that games are all about FUN. I remember when the highest resolution screen was 192x160 with perhaps 4 on-screen colours at a time (out of a fixed 16 colour palette), it didn't make those games crap, and it didn't make higher resolution games better. I still prefer some older games to more modern once (by older I mean 20+ years old, not 3 years) and so do some of you guys I bet. It does not matter how powerful the hardware is to make a good game, only that you think about the game your making and not try to sell any old crap just because you can make it in 3D with a super high resolution.
    To quote a semi-popular song/flash animation, "The games you get today, well, they might be very flash. But they'll never beat the thrill or getting through Jetpac..." (Jetpac is a simple yet fun game with a screen resolution similar to the DS and a fixed 16 [terrible] colour palette, and was released in 1983).

    So, please don't say that releasing a 'lower-spec' machine is a mistake, in many cases, it is the higher-spec machine that is the mistake as dev's tend to think that making a crap game with nice gfx and particle effects is much better than making an excellent game with average gfx.
     
  17. MicShadow

    Member MicShadow GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    457
    Country:
    Australia
    I can see where the original poster is coming from. Yes, I love all the games on Nintendo consoles (mostly first party ones but eh)
    But every system the big N has brought out is always lagging behind the rest in terms of power or graphics, Im not saying Nintendo should go for the PS3 and 360 path,
    but it would just be nice to have a better powered system.

    I mean, come on, 4MB of ram on the DSL? What the shit
     
  18. p1ngpong

    Supervisor p1ngpong Legit Boss Harold

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    6,296
    Location:
    DS Scene
    Country:
    Croatia
    Well N64 and GameCube in their day were awesomely powerful machines. Both failed. Ever since Nintendo have gone with their underpowered gimmicky consoles they have been printing money. So I guess they know how to sell things to people now.
     
  19. pEpz

    Newcomer pEpz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    30
    Location:
    Qc
    Country:
    Canada
    N64 Failed ?
     
  20. p1ngpong

    Supervisor p1ngpong Legit Boss Harold

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    6,296
    Location:
    DS Scene
    Country:
    Croatia
    Yes it got its ass handed to it by the playstation, if you try and say otherwise your wrong.
     

Share This Page