Because it does not harm animals. What is so difficult to understand about this concept?Actually, they care about the animals so why do they eat something to substitute it? Pretty wierd.
Because it does not harm animals. What is so difficult to understand about this concept?Actually, they care about the animals so why do they eat something to substitute it? Pretty wierd.
I know, it is just weird. IMO I'd they want a burger, they should eat a burger. Not a fake thing that taste like it.Because it does not harm animals. What is so difficult to understand about this concept?
But a burger involves the harm of animals.I know, it is just weird. IMO I'd they want a burger, they should eat a burger. Not a fake thing that taste like it.
So does most of humanities industrial and energy practices. I see how the morality of the decision to be vegan/vegetarian is justified. I just think it's a little over the top sometimes. I mean, we're animals anyways. So to think we need to break the food chain completely kinda comes off as arrogance saying humanity is above the rest of the animal kingdom.But a burger involves the harm of animals.
I'm not here to argue what people should or should not do with their diets. Just pointing out the stupidity of the argument that "you like the taste, so tell your morals to get fucked instead of eating the completely viable alternative available".So does most of humanities industrial and energy practices. I see how the morality of the decision to be vegan/vegetarian is justified. I just think it's a little over the top sometimes. I mean, we're animals anyways. So to think we need to break the food chain completely kinda comes off as arrogance saying humanity is above the rest of the animal kingdom.