MP3 encoding bitrates....how good are your ears? What's your standard choice?

Discussion in 'Books, Music, TV & Movies' started by xist, May 9, 2013.

  1. xist
    OP

    xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Member
    5,861
    863
    Jul 14, 2008
    Lots of people make decisions about the quality of MP3's they're happy with (in terms of bitrate) based upon an irrational sense of more is always better. And whilst more bits can be better, if you can't hear it (through it being out of your hearing range or you just "not" hearing it) then it's totally pointless to always opt for encodes beyond your best quality tolerance. Now people can ABX test for themselves but most of the time we don't bother and just trust a gut sense of our bitrate tolerance.

    Now, we can't embed MP3's into the forum and streaming sites will generally give you a file size, so i've had to work out a method to create a test to cover 5 different bitrates that's accessible to everyone (which knowing my luck people will ignore and this will fail to serve any purpose...)

    I've created a two and a half minute track of 5 samples encoded at different rates (ripped from CD to lossless PCM with EAC and then converted to MP3 with SoX). Listen to the clip (going back if necessary....each one starts after 29 seconds so if you just use 30 second jumps to skip between them you can compare your choices) and decide on an order of best to worst.

    Ignore the wrapping...the tags are borked to preserve the different encodes.

    Obviously listening hardware will determine how accurate you are so try to use your best headphones/speakers too. And it's two and a half minutes...just be aware that it'd be great if you didn't just stick in random answers. And please don't try to cheat...it's not a test of your "mad listening skills".

    Grab the track here (it's not anything awful...)

    http://www.mediafire.com/?h0bozv5ts2ajvuz

    Listen, (Don't Cheat it's pointless...) then post your conclusions. Best at the top down to worst...e.g

    Third clip (Best)
    Fifth
    First
    Fourth
    Second(Worst)

    IF THAT'S TOO HARD JUST TELL US WHICH ONES YOU WOULD ACCEPT AND WHICH YOU'D REJECT!


    Also stick in what bitrate you generally opt for in your MP3's!

    When interest dies (please be later rather than sooner) i'll let you know exactly what bitrates were used.

    Edit - Also i'll repeat myself.....please don't try to cheat...it serves no purpose and if anything you're cheating yourself.....
     


  2. KDH

    KDH GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    241
    29
    Apr 26, 2007
    United States
    Kansas
    It's saying permission denied. That was fast.
     
  3. xist
    OP

    xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Member
    5,861
    863
    Jul 14, 2008
    Holy crap...29 seconds of a song...i really thought that was ok given that every youtube video we post has more music in it...i'll just have to think of something else...


    Edit- i'm querying the takedown....falls under part 2 of http://www.royaltyfreemusic.com/public-domain/basic-rules-fair-use.html

    I'm also not reuploading because if it turns out that this isn't fair use for "research" it's an honest mistake and i don't want to contravene any laws
     
  4. frogboy

    frogboy lacking both style and grace

    Member
    2,377
    1,416
    Dec 6, 2011
    United States
    Darn, I wanted to try.
     
  5. ollepoll

    ollepoll GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    162
    1
    Apr 21, 2010
    Gambia, The
    germany
    I generally like my music uncompressed (FLAC) and for my portably player I use mp3 320, would really like to try this
     
  6. GamerzHell9137

    GamerzHell9137 GBAtemp Psycho!

    Member
    3,828
    1,655
    Nov 1, 2011
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Me too :/
     
  7. gifi4

    gifi4 How am I a 'New Member'?

    Member
    2,352
    143
    Apr 21, 2010
    Melbourne
    I'm one of those people who doesn't care about bitrates and whatnot. So long as it sounds good it'll stay in my collection.
     
    Riyaz likes this.
  8. air2004

    air2004 Air

    Member
    1,620
    450
    Oct 24, 2008
    United States
    Anytown
    I want to to try too

    you could post it on youtube , make it hidden , then share the link here
     
  9. LinkFan16

    LinkFan16 I link them all

    Member
    408
    99
    Mar 15, 2009
    Gambia, The
    I always go with 320 kbps. I got so used to that over time that if I hear anything with a lower bitrate, I immediately recognize that something is missing.
     
  10. xist
    OP

    xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Member
    5,861
    863
    Jul 14, 2008
    Youtube would compress the audio making the whole point moot.

    What i'll do is wait for a reply from MF, and if they actually explain things i'll grab a free, non licensed song from Bandcamp and start over...
     
  11. Tokiopop

    Tokiopop Caffeine fiend

    Member
    1,833
    169
    Apr 14, 2009
    UK
    I've not done this particular test, but I've done some 'blind' testing myself between 320kbps mp3 audio and FLAC and I could tell the difference for 9 out of the 10 tracks. Without comparison I don't think I would notice though.

    When it starts getting to 180kbps stuff I can almost always tell immediately without comparison to a higher bit-rate version of the same track.
     
  12. xist
    OP

    xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Member
    5,861
    863
    Jul 14, 2008
    Mediafire have just replied saying they'll look into it so hopefully you'll get the chance to test your mettle. ;)
     
  13. trumpet-205

    trumpet-205 Embrace the darkness within

    Member
    4,363
    542
    Jan 14, 2009
    United States
    Whether or not you can tell a difference involves a lot of factors. Take for example, are you using quality speakers or headphone? Are you using quality sound card or external DAC? How is your source? How is your audio encoder? What settings did you use? etc...

    It is true that higher bitrate means less data being discarded (better in a sense that it is close to original source). But if you have say cheap Logitech speaker using motherboard sound chip, chances are you won't be able to tell a difference.
     
    Tokiopop likes this.
  14. LockeCole_101629

    LockeCole_101629 GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    276
    62
    Jul 6, 2012
    New Zealand
    if the source is from original disc, 128kbps is enough for me.
     
  15. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,110
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Gotta' love targeted ads.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. AlanJohn

    AlanJohn くたばれ

    Member
    3,457
    2,930
    Jan 6, 2011
    Canada,New Jersey
    I always use FLAC. 320b is the bare minimum for me.
     
    DinohScene likes this.
  17. xist
    OP

    xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Member
    5,861
    863
    Jul 14, 2008
    Mediafire haven't replied but it seems like they've decided i'm clear for what i've used. Listen to the 5 clips and be bored stimulated!
     
  18. air2004

    air2004 Air

    Member
    1,620
    450
    Oct 24, 2008
    United States
    Anytown
    1 sounds like its missing someting , kind of hollow
    2 sounds like it has more bass
    3 sounds like I hear more intruments
    4 sounds like the right ballance between bass , and all instruments
    5 sounds like 4
     
  19. xist
    OP

    xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Member
    5,861
    863
    Jul 14, 2008

    That's great and everything but which are you happy with the encode quality and which would you reject as not good enough?


    I do mention that it's hardware related in the first post when i suggest that your best (or just your regular) listening set-up is used. It seemed redundant mentioning every different element as i can count the number of people i know with an external DAC on one hand (excluding myself!) As for the encoder, for this test we're assessing MP3, the most common format and that being the case i've opted for the most recent LAME binary (which has no history of regressions and should be ideal). The encoder choice you have to view as optimal so it's primarily about if you're ripping your own music then what bitrate would you be happy with?
     
  20. Issac

    Issac I

    Global Moderator
    GBAtemp Patron
    Issac is a Patron of GBAtemp and is helping us stay independent!

    Our Patreon
    5,275
    2,379
    Apr 10, 2004
    Sweden
    Sweden
    Okay, so here's mine. I usually use 320 kbit/s (but nothing beats a good vinyl!)
    Warning: Spoilers inside!

    And I'd accept everyone of these to be honest... But if I were to choose, I'd reject the bottom two.
     
    xist likes this.