Periods are a junk argument when you consider the fact that women are already in the military
I quoted one of your posts but i am replying to all of them. You sir, are a moron. So far up your own egalitarian/feminist ass that you openly deny reality and are gleaming with pride about it. Women are not good combatants, they also under perform men in every single field without exception. They have IQ 10 points lower on average, they are smaller in size and physically weaker and this is obvious by just looking at the real world. Stop reading feminist propaganda and look out the window for once.
so according to you Lyudmila Pavlivchenko is less of a soldier than most male soldiers and that while she is considered on of the best snipers the world had ever seen ? Israel is known to have strong soldiers and 50 percent of them are female so in that regard their army shouldn't be strong at all but they're considered one of the strongest in the world
Are we talking about groups or individuals? Pick one. I'm speaking generally and you can't use anecdotal evicende to refute what i said. Sure you can find a few women exceptionally good at combat, so what? Generally they still suck.
how is 50 percent of the entire army of israel being female anecdotal evidence and them considered to have one of the strongest armies in the world ? That's not a few women but actually a lot of women
In the current year the strength is largely determined by the funding and the weaponry and Israel has one of the highest funded military in the world. And i don't know much more about Israel army, but care to tell me what roles do women play in the army? Are they infantry combatants?
shooting a gun doesn't have anything to do with who is smaller or weaker but who is the better shot. Being smaller and leaner also makes it so that you can crawl faster and more agile through small spaces.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/19/problems-women-combat-cant-be-mitigated-report/
Women get panic attacks under stress.
Both of which are not necessarily disadvantages. Brute strength has very little to do with modern soldiering. There are scenario's where a smaller person is an advantage also. Basically you're simply grasping for excuses for your sexism.
Do you realize how far you're bending over backwards to ignore reality? Men and women are different and women are not suited for combat. Guns or no guns. There are scenarios? are these scenarios so common they make up 50% or all war operations or are they rare enough to be told as stories? And i will repeat my point that women panic under stress, and that's because stress produces testosterone in men and adrenaline in women. This is biological. Women are just not good for combat.
I hope the war designers have built in lots of parcour spots in their next mission opportunities then.
Sorry not gonna respond to someone who calls me mental because i think women should have the same rights as a man in the army. I'm not a feminist at all and i do hate feminists since men also have their problems that get ignored by the main stream but i do agree with equality and that means men and women should be all treated the same. An example would be army courses and everybody would be treated the same '' if more women fail that test than men, then so be it ! But the ones who do succeed should be treated the same !''. You basically calling me mental and placing men above women makes you a sexist yes and feminists who place women above men are also sexists. That's just how it is so in that regard ur no better off than a feminist. If you're okay with being a sexist then so be it but i don't want anything to do with that. Def not gonna argue with feminists and sexists because that's a pointless discussion with no end and them having a narcistic approach to that discussion '' i'm always right and won't change my mind ''
