As we seem to be doing the related video thing
http://video.nytimes.com/video/2011/06/19/...s-playbook.html
Granted this is more of an accounting thing (I got linked from
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/06/2...iation_holiday/ which also covers a bit or related stuff and why subsidiaries are a good idea for some business) but some concepts carry over.
jumpman17 said:
I don't understand...how can the official seller of Yu-Gi-Oh cards make counterfeit cards? Wouldn't printing a card at the official printer make it an official card? Or were they scribbling on napkins on their lunch break and selling them in Ziploc bags to idiots?
The same way that if the mint printed some money using the real ink, the real cloth and real plates but without the authorisation of the relevant authorities it would still be counterfeit although this more than currency is probably about artificial scarcity and intellectual property conferring some value. Assuming it was funnelled through the subsidiary I would not be surprised if they instead went for an undeclared profits route (I guess they still own shares or some such) rather than some contract law depending on what will net them the most money but this is rapidly leaving my preferred area of law so I will keep speculation at that.
"Also, there are tons of fake Yu-Gi-Oh cards, which neither Konami or Upper Deck recieved royalties from, suing those makes more sense then suing your own subsidiary."
If it was worth it I am sure they would but this is a clear cut case of bad practice by an entity big enough and ugly enough to know what goes with I presume a good chance of winning something.
@TehSkull most of the rest of the world already gets to import their card/board games, comics and things that usually find themselves in the same shops that sell such things so I am sure people will step up for it should it come to it.