• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Legality of Musk's daily million dollar voter lottery put into question

titan_tim

(Can't shut up)
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
840
Trophies
2
Location
Tokyo
XP
3,359
Country
Japan
This all feels very illegal, but I can't imagine Musk would do something like this without consulting his army of lawyers for every way they can sneak out of accountability. I believe since it's a petition to vote, it skirts the law just enough.

That being said, as long as anyone is eligible to vote for who they want to, it should be a good thing, as higher voter turnout usually benefits the left.
 

gudenau

Largely ignored
Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
4,094
Trophies
2
Location
/dev/random
Website
www.gudenau.net
XP
6,581
Country
United States
This is your opinion

I disagree personally and so do many people

But this is exactly what I mean when I say many Democrats do not support the second amendment

A lot of people can be wrong at once. :-)

It's an antiquated law from a more archaic time that's being heavily abused. I whole heartily think the founding fathers didn't want people to be murdering people so often and at such crazy ratios. The way this is written is pretty clear that it isn't currently applicable and everyone I've brought it up with in real life has agreed with me (yes anecdotal evidence so there's not a lot of weight), I believe if they knew the damage it would cause it would have been more clear about the militia part.
 

x65943

mods = gods
OP
Supervisor
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
6,882
Trophies
6
Location
Between 27 & 1/2 lesbian
XP
33,733
Country
United States
A lot of people can be wrong at once. :-)

It's an antiquated law from a more archaic time that's being heavily abused. I whole heartily think the founding fathers didn't want people to be murdering people so often and at such crazy ratios. The way this is written is pretty clear that it isn't currently applicable and everyone I've brought it up with in real life has agreed with me (yes anecdotal evidence so there's not a lot of weight), I believe if they knew the damage it would cause it would have been more clear about the militia part.
thankfully we don't have to go on anecdote because we have data

56% of americans want stricter rules, so majority want change
1729643685994.png


however, only 27% want to actually ban handguns, the least lethal gun, but most often used in crime - and that number has been falling for 60 years, meaning less people want to ban now than before

1729643716326.png


Most people think guns make homes safer

1729643783360.png


44% of homes have guns in them

The takeaway, people don't want to ban guns, they just want to make the rules a little stricter to keep them out of the hands of crazies

so your idea that most people think the 2nd amendment is antiquated appears to be more a product of the people you surround yourself with - who of course will be more likely to share your opinion

https://news.gallup.com/poll/513623/majority-continues-favor-stricter-gun-laws.aspx
 

Viri

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,566
Trophies
2
XP
7,413
Country
United States
Oh shit, you can get paid to sign a petition? I need to get in on that!

Thanks for posting this, I just signed my self and my family members up! If he actually follows through, woot Switch 2 money!
Holy shit, I actually got a check for 100 dollars today from American PAC Petition. I didn't think they'd actually send them. lol
 

Viri

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,566
Trophies
2
XP
7,413
Country
United States
No you didnt
Yes I did. I got $100 for my self for signing, and I referred my parents and sister, which was $100 for each referral.
Post automatically merged:

I already cashed the check at my bank days ago. And why even doubt this? Tons of people in my state got money for signing this dumb petition. You can easily find out via Google, it's not like it's a secret. Some people even got it without signing the petition. lmao
https://www.fox43.com/article/money...heck/521-cdca013b-d33a-4460-8fc2-0191e0b27e2f
 
Last edited by Viri,

MrQQ

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
97
Trophies
0
Age
37
Location
Scotland
XP
585
Country
United Kingdom
Yes I did. I got $100 for my self for signing, and I referred my parents and sister, which was $100 for each referral.
Post automatically merged:


I already cashed the check at my bank days ago. And why even doubt this? Tons of people in my state got money for signing this dumb petition. You can easily find out via Google, it's not like it's a secret. Some people even got it without signing the petition. lmao
https://www.fox43.com/article/money...heck/521-cdca013b-d33a-4460-8fc2-0191e0b27e2f
oh sorry its fox news...must be true
 

UnderJinx

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
455
Trophies
0
Age
51
XP
1,508
Country
Denmark

Tesla CEO Elon Musk loses bid to get $56 billion pay package reinstated​

Published Mon, Dec 2 20244:56 PM ESTUpdated Mon, Dec 2 20248:08 PM EST
thumbnail

Lora Kolodny@in/lorakolodny/
ShareShare Article via FacebookShare Article via TwitterShare Article via LinkedInShare Article via Email
Key Points
  • Elon Musk lost his bid to have his $56 billion 2018 pay package reinstated.
  • A Delaware judge upheld her January ruling in a case brought by shareholders that said the process leading to approval of the pay package was “deeply flawed.”
  • In June, Tesla took a vote at its annual meeting, asking shareholders to “ratify” the 2018 pay plan, and leaned on that result to challenge the judge’s previous ruling.
  • “Were the court to condone the practice of allowing defeated parties to create new facts for the purpose of revising judgments, lawsuits would become interminable,” Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick wrote in her opinion.
In this article
Follow your favorite stocksCREATE FREE ACCOUNT
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Elon Musk listens as US President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. As is tradition with incoming presidents, President-elect Trump is traveling to Washington, DC to meet with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as well as Republican members of Congress on Capitol Hill. (Photo by Allison Robbert-Pool/Getty Images)

Elon Musk listens as US President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024 in Washington, DC.
Allison Robbert | Getty Images
Tesla CEO Elon Musk on Monday lost his bid to get his 2018 CEO pay package reinstated when a Delaware judge upheld her prior ruling that the compensation plan was improperly granted.
The package, worth about $56 billion, was the largest compensation plan in U.S. history for a public company executive. Tesla said in a post on social media platform X, which Musk owns, that it plans to appeal the ruling. Musk, in a separate X post, called the ruling “absolute corruption.”

In January, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick voided the pay plan, ruling that Musk had individually “controlled Tesla” and dictated the terms of his compensation to a board that didn’t fairly negotiate. She called the process leading to approval of that pay plan “deeply flawed.”
Following the opinion, Tesla conducted a shareholder vote in June at its annual meeting in Austin, Texas, asking investors to “ratify” Musk’s 2018 CEO pay plan. Musk’s attorneys attempted to sway the judge to reverse her opinion after the trial, leaning on the results of that vote.
“Even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here,” McCormick wrote in her opinion Monday. “Were the court to condone the practice of allowing defeated parties to create new facts for the purpose of revising judgments, lawsuits would become interminable.”
As part of Monday’s opinion, McCormick approved a $345 million attorney fee award for the lawyers who successfully sued on behalf of Tesla shareholders in order to void Musk’s pay plan.
“We are pleased with Chancellor McCormick’s ruling, which declined Tesla’s invitation to inject continued uncertainty into Court proceedings and thank the Chancellor and her staff for their extraordinary hard work in overseeing this complex case,” attorneys from Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann, the firm representing the plaintiff, said in a statement.

Following the January decision, Musk lashed out at the Delaware court, posting on X, “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware.” Tesla then held a shareholder vote to reincorporate in Texas, and officially shifted its state of incorporation there.
Musk has also moved the state of incorporation for his defense contractor company SpaceX to Texas from Delaware.
Despite the legal setback, Musk has seen his net worth jump considerably in recent weeks. Excluding all of the options wrapped up in the pay package, Musk is more than $43 billion richer since Donald Trump’s election victory in November. Tesla shares have soared 42% in the four weeks since the election on optimism that Musk’s coziness with the incoming president will lead to policies favorable to his companies.
The Tesla stock Musk still holds is worth close to $150 billion based on Monday’s closing price. That alone, not including his SpaceX stake, would put him among the world’s wealthiest people. Equilar estimates that at today’s stock price Musk’s 2018 package would have risen to be worth $101.4 billion.
WATCH: Elon Musk emerges as key voice in Trump’s tech policy:D:D:D
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042: "I'm not fucking playing around"