Do I also need to explain what paraphrasing is to you? I'm quoting what you didn't actually say, but what you actually meant.
-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States
- Thread starter yusuo
- Start date
- Views 373,007
- Replies 7,444
- Likes 45
- Status
I've met my burden of proof. You have not. If you cannot put up, then respectfully, you can shut up.
With regard to being an idiot or disingenuous, those are the only two options.
Lol. We all need to know what you mean by paraphrasing, because you are doing it wrong.
Mind reader @Joom strikes again!
No you haven't.
Put up or shut up?
When did I not?
You argued that, per burden of proof standards, Amanda had the burden of proof. In reality, she did not make the positive claim: You did. Therefore, you are either being dishonest, or you were ignorant about how burden of proof works. There is no other option.
If you're going to argue there's another option, congratulations. You have the burden of proof again.
You're still trying to argue in "gotchas", but failing even more miserably than before. "We" know what paraphrasing is, so I don't need to explain it to anyone else but you, apparently.
@UltraSUPRA, choose carefully where you put your likes, because you're siding with a pedophile here. You really want us to develop a worse opinion of you? You're already a white nationalist. The rung below that is pedophile.
Holy crap. Even when I tell you what the other option is, you ignore it and carry on. I don't need to adopt you and take care of you, but this is what you are turning "burden of proof" into.
Jeez dude. This paraphrasing is liberating.
Last edited by tabzer,
You didn't provide another option. Put up or shut up. I'll add this one to the list of things you can't or won't do.
That is another option which you didn't account for. Your "list" has no meaningful command or authoritative consistency.
Last edited by tabzer,
You said that, per the standards of burden of proof I was articulating, Amanda had the burden of proof. That was incorrect, and it was either because you were ignorant or disingenuous.
Your "honoring customs" post was irrelevant and did nothing to provide another option.
So, as I said, I'll add this one to the list of things you objectively and demonstrably will not provide evidence for.
Amanda has the burden of proof to do what? Prove I was a lying?
That would be quite the conundrum, because you saying that would imply that everyone here is either disingenuous or idiots (or both?).
Lol, aren't we mad. You can change whatever is in a [QUOTE] tag all you like. It doesn't change the fact that you're being disingenuous about defending pedophilia. Sorry I paraphrased correctly, and it angered you, so you tried to do the same but incorrectly. The difference here is that you are misquoting, the thing you blamed me for. Learn what paraphrasing is if you're going to involve yourself in debate.
Last edited by Joom,
You made a claim that Amanda said something she didn't. You had the burden of proof to show she said what you claimed she said. To call you a liar is to call you out on your inability to put up. You have the positive claim. You have the burden of proof. To say she does is to be ignorant or dishonest.
I don't see how.
I fixed it. Sorry the coding of the site autocompletes BB code. However, if you've been a forum user as long as I have, you know how to sequence break BB code. Bet you can't do it, as shown by your fail quote.
Last edited by Joom,
Funny how you're calling me a white nationalist when your side supports race-based affirmative action, letting black people enter more prestigious colleges with lower grades compared to whites because, according to other Libtards, blacks have some sort of disadvantage when it comes to intelligence.
Also, Biden has a track record of racism against blacks, pushing the Crime Bill (that Harris enforced) and saying some very controversial things. Poor kids can be just as smart and talented as white kids, if you vote for Trump you ain't black, Obama was the first mainstream African American who is articulate, bright, and clean, you can't go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin' Donuts without a slight Indian accent, Biden doesn't want his kids growing up in a racial jungle...hell, I'm pretty sure he said the N-word.
But you already know that. Your goal wasn't to get Biden in, it was to get Orange Man out because Orange Man Bad. Once he's in, all you have to do is keep a close eye on him and screech at him when he does something bad. You said it yourself a few pages back.
How did I respond?
Last edited by UltraSUPRA,
She did. She even was nice enough to come back and verify it.
That's because you are either being disingenuous or an idiot.
Fact check: Race-based affirmative action exists because of socioeconomic challenges certain races face because of slavery and/or mistreatment of races in the past. Without it, well-off white families tend to stay well-off, while families of lower socioeconomic statuses continue to not be well-off.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Vetusomaru:
psychic academy. lol. it was meh even back then when i bought volume 1. also same author also made one of the manga adaptions of Escaflowne. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Vetusomaru:
crynchyrolls is cancer, especially with the censorship they do like they did with Oshimai
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
