Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[Lacius]

Wikipedia is not a peer reviewed paper from a medical journal, and studies other than very recent hysteria driven anecdotes do not claim efficacy of cloth masks.

It's a good thing then that it's a compendium of sources, including peer reviewed papers from medical journals, huh?

In addition to checking those sources out, perhaps read my point on how it wouldn't matter in the slightest if every bit of data we had on cloth masks was from 2020.

 

[djpannda]

Wikipedia is not a peer reviewed paper from a medical journal, and studies other than very recent hysteria driven anecdotes do not claim efficacy of cloth masks.

Yea Jumbo ,, Facebook and twitter is the only medical papers we need

 

[jimbo13]

In addition to checking those sources out, perhaps read my point on how it wouldn't matter in the slightest if every bit of data we had on cloth masks was from 2020.[/QUOTE

Sure it does, if we have 50 years of research all stating the same thing, recent studies done in a panic on anecdotal evidence is not as strong. I prefer the numerous prior sources to recent hysteria driven ones. Good science demonstrates it was free of a agenda driven motivation.

 

[Lacius]

Sure it does, if we have 50 years of research all stating the same thing, recent studies done in a panic on anecdotal evidence is not as strong. I prefer the numerous prior sources to recent hysteria driven ones.

I could post a number of wrong scientific ideas that were the consensus for 50+ years before they were eventually disproved. If you had a scientific background, you'd know that. Hell, I wasn't even allowed to use scientific papers that were 10+ years old half the time.

And, again, we have science from before 2020 on the efficacy of cloth masks.

I honestly feel like you've more or less given up and you're arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.

 

[jimbo13]

And, again, we have science from before 2020 on the efficacy of cloth masks.

Fact check :And that science says they don't disrupt airborne pathogens.

 

[SG854]

Sure it does, if we have 50 years of research all stating the same thing, recent studies done in a panic on anecdotal evidence is not as strong. I prefer the numerous prior sources to recent hysteria driven ones. Good science demonstrates it was free of a agenda driven motivation.

How recent are the studies you are looking at? The date matters.

 

[Lacius]

Fact check : No you don't.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloth_face_mask

Scroll down to the efficacy studies.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

How recent are the studies you are looking at? The date matters.

@jimbo13 doesn't understand. That, or he's put partisanship way above science.

 

[jimbo13]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloth_face_mask

Scroll down to the efficacy studies.

No, I already been down this rabbit hole and I read numerous sources on the topic. I went straight to academic databases and there was no long term studies demonstrating the efficacy of masks.

 

[notimp]

Wikipedia is not a peer reviewed paper from a medical journal, and studies other than very recent hysteria driven anecdotes do not claim efficacy of cloth masks.

Here: German Center of Air and Space Travel has looked into how much they stop/affect aerosol dispersion
https://www.dlr.de/content/de/artikel/news/2020/04/20201026_aeromask.html (german) - scientifically.

Result: The experiments show clearly the effect of every day type masks (chirurgical, cloth) on the dispersion of exhaled aerosols and particles, in addition to their positive effect on infection prevention.

That doesnt help, if they are in on the big social engineering project you are afraid of, of course.

 

[jimbo13]

Here: German Center of Air and Space Travel has looked into how much they stop aerosol dispersion
https://www.dlr.de/content/de/artikel/news/2020/04/20201026_aeromask.html (german) - scientifically.

Result: The experimnts show clearly the effect of every day type masks (chirurgical, cloth) on the dispersion of exhaled aerosols and particles, in addition to their positive effect on infection prevention.

That doesnt help, if they are in on the big social engineering project you are afraid of, of course.

Links dead dude.

 

[UltraSUPRA]

Links dead dude.

No, it's not.

 

[Lacius]

No, I already been down this rabbit hole and I read numerous sources on the topic. I went straight to academic databases and there was no long term studies demonstrating the efficacy of masks.

Somebody isn't doing his homework and somehow thinks he's going to do well on the test.

Somebody also thinks he can arbitrarily discount the preponderance of studies we have just because they commit the grave sin of being *gasp* contemporaneous.

That's a bad combination.

 

[SG854]

No, I already been down this rabbit hole and I read numerous sources on the topic. I went straight to academic databases and there was no long term studies demonstrating the efficacy of masks.

Well post them. Show us your sources. If you are confident your sources are correct and infallible, then show us them.

 

[djpannda]

@jimbo13[/USER] doesn't understand. That, or he's put partisanship way above science.

No, I already been down this rabbit hole and I read numerous sources on the topic. I went straight to academic databases and there was no long term studies demonstrating the efficacy of masks.

YEA WE ALREADY PROVIDED the screen shot from facebook post from "notarussianbot42" and they still don't believe mask don't work.. Liberal don't understand how news and science work now

 

[UltraSUPRA]

And Gore was the president of 2000.

 

[notimp]

Links dead dude.

Link works here.

Here is the google cache entry:

https://webcache.googleusercontent....01026_aeromask.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=de

Here is the archive.org snapshot:
https://web.archive.org/web/2020110...e/artikel/news/2020/04/20201026_aeromask.html

 

[Joom]

And Gore was the president of 2000.

Unironically thinking Trump is gonna be able to pull a Bush, lol. This video is about you, bud.

 

[Lacius]

And Gore was the president of 2000.

Al Gore should have been the president in 2000/2001, for several reasons.

 

[Joom]

Al Gore should have been the president in 2000/2001, for several reasons.

See the above video.

 

[Lacius]

See the above video.

Oh, I saw it. I didn't feel the need to respond to it.