Like I said, it's really not arguable. That is EXACTLY why people make counter-suits. It happens all the time. But you have your own opinions obviously... or at least someone's.
I should start calling you the reach-around boys, because you are constantly reaching here.
Dominion's suing for defamation because falsely claiming they instigated widespread election fraud is basically the most defamatory lie you could possibly make about a
voting machine company.
If they DIDN'T sue, these dumbfucks would take it as a sign they were right (somehow- you'll take it as a sign of fraud either way even though there literally is none) and spread the word, which would annihilate Dominion's reputation as a company for something they didn't do.
It's called basic logic. Try it some time.
@lacuis, that doesn't really mean much coming from you. You have showed your prejudice time and time again. But yeah, way to stick to a non-topic to throw shade on your own shortfalls you've demonstrated in this thread. Hoorayy!
Where is your proof that they were not involved in acceptable behavior?
There is a lot of court cases going on right now, and going to be happening. You probably are not paying attention, but the truth is slowly being revealed case by case.
IIRC there's been around sixty cases, and Trump's team of morons only managed to win ONE.
Besides, as we've said to plenty others, that's not how the burden of proof works.
You started by making the claim of voter fraud.
You must prove it with evidence and explanation.
End of story. Prove your point or fuck off.
@
x65943:
@
JuanMena:
