Okay, then that's two points of me not being actually being an idiot. I'll take that.
Nah, it's still idiotic to believe all mail-in ballots are fraudulent, as you've implied multiple times.
It's strangely ironic that "the survival of the fittest" has turned into "the survival of the pussycats". Care to shed some insight? It's off topic, but It's interesting.
It's not that complicated: Republicans made themselves into a small-tent party by excluding anyone who isn't a straight, white, Christian male (and their wives). Which allowed Democrats to seize the opportunity to become a big-tent party, welcoming of everybody else. That diversity can be both a strength and a weakness at different times and in different circumstances, but a wannabe-dictator like Trump heading up the other party is an easy shortcut to Democratic unification.
Okay, so propaganda provided by "Wapo" suggests that it's a non-issue. You should have led with that.
Had you bothered to look, you'd know the data used in the article is from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC). This "propaganda" also doesn't include data on the 2020 election, only 2016 and 2018. But yes, I assumed there would be no legitimate academic or journalistic source which would be acceptable by your standards.
