Biden's Stimulus: Adds a $5,500 dollar debt to every American man, Woman and Child.
$1,400 = What you get out of it. (might end up being less if you do not meet certain criteria, and/or you might not even be able to get is like many people who still have not received their last $600)
$1,067 = Bail out blue states such as CA and NY
$177 = Bail out Union pension plans
$750 = Extend unemployment benefits (pay people more to sit home then they could actually go out and make working)
$34 = Museums and Native American language preservation
$393 = K-12
$122 = Colleges and Universities
$58 = Public Health Organizations including Planned Parenthood
$128 = Transportation Grants including Amtrak
$49 = Agriculture
$30 = Foreign aid
$1,279 = Various progressive priorities
Seems to me like this is more about control than helping...
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Biden reminds me of Ray Zalinsky, " I make car parts for the American working man, because that's what I am, and that's who I care about... The truth is I make car parts for the American working man because I am a hell of a salesman and he doesn't know any better."
Let's see here.
$1,400: What you get out of it. The "last $600" already came, and it came first- that was the fraction Trump was willing to send out as a PR move.
$1,067: Upon further inspection, this seems to just be bailing out states. In general.
All of them.
$750: Extending unemployment benefits- i.e. paying people that
can't find a well-paying job more so that they can fucking survive. The apathy and victim-blaming complex within the Republican party is just incredible, and the fact you can't mention unemployment or something of the sort without accusing those basically just trying to survive of being lazy just proves that.
$34: Museums and cultural preservation.
$515: Education.
$58: Public health.
$128: Transportation. Insert obligatory Amtrak Joe meme here.
$49: Agriculture.
$30: Foreign aid.
$1,279: What does "various progressive priorities" even mean? You're clearly trying to use "progressive" as a snarl word, but with zero context it's really not going to work.
None of these moves seem to be about control or partisanship. And here's a reminder: none of that is coming
directly out of the average man's pockets. You frame it as a debt on the working man when a) it isn't, that's literally not how this works and b) even if it is, if the only way to solve our nation's problems is to make everyone chip in then
so fucking be it.