Ishihara has been re-elected

[twiztidsinz]

He is banning all that anime shit that has kids who appear under 18 doing anything that could be considered sexual, am I right? I'm fine with that, I don't like pedophiles.

Even in bikinis, so since May from Pokemon wore a bikini once, it'll be banned.

if shes under 18 and its shown for pervs then it should be banned

It's people like you who think they know what's best for everyone because everyone but you is bad/wrong that's the problem.

 

[GreatZimkogway]

I wanna know how this idiot got re-elected. With all the crap he's done? Including the most recent?

 

[Hells Malice]

He is banning all that anime shit that has kids who appear under 18 doing anything that could be considered sexual, am I right? I'm fine with that, I don't like pedophiles.

Even in bikinis, so since May from Pokemon wore a bikini once, it'll be banned.

if shes under 18 and its shown for pervs then it should be banned

Are you playing devils advocate or are you genuinely retarded?

Read what's actually getting banned. It goes above and beyond hindering "pervs". But, you wouldn't know that because you never actually READ what is being banned, you just wanted to be the big bad kid who has a different opinion from the general flow of the thread.

 

[deathking]

He is banning all that anime shit that has kids who appear under 18 doing anything that could be considered sexual, am I right? I'm fine with that, I don't like pedophiles.
Even in bikinis, so since May from Pokemon wore a bikini once, it'll be banned.

if shes under 18 and its shown for pervs then it should be banned

It's people like you who think they know what's best for everyone because everyone but you is bad/wrong that's the problem.

everyone but me the people of japan who voted for him and ishihara himself
it seems im in the majority
ratings systems are needed otherwise extremely violent anime and explicit porn can be sold to children dressed up as a cartoon
and as i said if that pokemon ep was set up for pervs it should be banned from children and edited or released as R rated in the adult section

QUOTE(KingdomBlade @ Apr 13 2011, 06:07 AM)

QUOTE(omgpwn666 @ Apr 13 2011, 12:58 PM)

He is banning all that anime shit that has kids who appear under 18 doing anything that could be considered sexual, am I right? I'm fine with that, I don't like pedophiles.

Even in bikinis, so since May from Pokemon wore a bikini once, it'll be banned.

if shes under 18 and its shown for pervs then it should be banned

Are you playing devils advocate or are you genuinely retarded?

Read what's actually getting banned. It goes above and beyond hindering "pervs". But, you wouldn't know that because you never actually READ what is being banned, you just wanted to be the big bad kid who has a different opinion from the general flow of the thread.

i read it
henti and other anime porn will be in the adult area of a shop
and im genuinely retarded?
looks like your defend some people who want to kill a guy because he said sexualized cartoons with 6 year olds in bathing suits designed for pervs should be banned

Heres what the bill said that passed

Any manga, animation, or pictures (but not including real life pictures or footage) that features either sexual or pseudo sexual acts that would be illegal in real life, or sexual or pseudo sexual acts between close relatives whose marriage would be illegal*, where such depictions and / or presentations unjustifiably glorify or exaggerate the activity.

Any sexually arousing posing on the behalf of children under the age of 13 wholly or partially naked, or wearing swimwear or only underwear, published in books or featured in film, must take into account of how the child’s mind and body may be harmed by becoming the object of sexual desire, and therefore parental guardians must exercise parental responsibilities to prevent and educate minors from becoming featured in such work or child pornography.

 

[Hop2089]

Heres what the bill said that passed

Any manga, animation, or pictures (but not including real life pictures or footage) that features either sexual or pseudo sexual acts that would be illegal in real life, or sexual or pseudo sexual acts between close relatives whose marriage would be illegal*, where such depictions and / or presentations unjustifiably glorify or exaggerate the activity.

Any sexually arousing posing on the behalf of children under the age of 13 wholly or partially naked, or wearing swimwear or only underwear, published in books or featured in film, must take into account of how the child’s mind and body may be harmed by becoming the object of sexual desire, and therefore parental guardians must exercise parental responsibilities to prevent and educate minors from becoming featured in such work or child pornography.

That's only part of the bill and the amended bill includes violence not just sex so that must be from the original unmodified bill.

 

[stanleyopar2000]

there is no god...

if if this can happen...that schtick Obama will get re-elected too...

of course you realize "the powers that be" will elect who they want...look what happened with the united states president bush

[Conspiracy Rant ENDED]

So i guess Chiyo-Chan* in a bathing suit is worse than satan or world hunger or starving individuals in japan.


*Azumanga Diaoh