Hacking Is there a WBFS manager that does not depend on .Net?

zektor

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,340
Trophies
1
XP
382
Country
United States
I am looking for a non-command line version (or perhaps a command line version with GUI) that does not depend on MS .net. I have been using WBFS manager for awhile now, and while great, there have been occasions in which something goes wrong with my .net installation and I have to re-run and repair it. I only find this out when I go to boot the program and I get a .net error instead. Why must nearly everything today completely rely on .net?
 

s3phir0th115

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
728
Trophies
1
XP
1,003
Country
United States
I would just use the windows command line port. I know you may like GUI's and all, but the command line isn't really as hard as you may believe.

And, it sure as hell is more reliable than .net.
 

zektor

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,340
Trophies
1
XP
382
Country
United States
Thanks for all of the replies. I tested them all, and out of everything the Intelligent GUI is most definitely the best. It already performs certain functions (like archiving of multiple ISO or cISO unattended) that WBFS Manager has yet to accomplish. The *only* thing that bugs me a little about it is the fact that filenames with spaces becomes underscores (ie: "Virtua Tennis 2009" becomes "Virtua_Tennis_2009"). Or is there a way to STOP this behavior in the app?
 

0M39A

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
374
Trophies
0
XP
26
Country
I think the one i used was just simply called wbfs gui. i had the same problem that .net wouldnt install, but since then ive done a reformat and it works fine now.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Ending to the fallout series was lame could've gave us a bit more