Is there a more "efficient way" to sift through 30,000 songs...

Ryccardo

watching Thames TV from London
Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
7,403
Trophies
0
Age
27
Location
Imola
XP
6,390
Country
Italy
Also, is there away to acquire metadata for songs without manually entering it in?
Yes and no, there are tools that use properties like song length to match a database, but they only work best with unmodified and full-album rips, they rarely produce an exact match (if any) on loose files - Windows Media Player has this feature but it mostly requires part of the metadata to already be there, EasyTag has a "enter album name and select in track list" but it's far from automated...

If you have standardized filenames, plenty of tools (like mp3tag or easytag) that split file and folder names to actual tags

Then there are audio-fingerprinting tools based on the actual sound (like what's used in Shazam) but I haven't heard of any major tools using this technology in the way you want...
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
35,816
Trophies
3
Website
trastindustries.com
XP
26,136
Country
United Kingdom
Best is a rather subjective term.

"Acquire metadata" is a different matter. There are multiple services that do various things to identify songs, the best tending to be some kind of acoustic fingerprinting feature. I am not sure what the kids are using but my old standby of https://www.mp3tag.de/en/index.html supports MusicBrainz which offers such a feature.

If by best songs you are one of those people that likes to have their opinion told to them then I am sure there are ones which will partner up with whatever the song equivalent of IMDB is and use their rating system. If you are willing to be a bit more involved you can probably find a service which offers either a useful million different genres (netflix I am told do something similar for films and TV with thousands of hidden genres/tags) type refinement for things you know you like, or you could go a bit more old fashioned and use the "if you like ? you may like * approach of conventional review sites.
 

Gizametalman

Banned!
Banned
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
974
Trophies
0
Age
29
Location
D.F. - Zona Cero.
XP
685
Country
Mexico
I thought I was the only one having this problem.

Do as I do... rename all your music by genre or artist or add something that you'll know it makes it one of your favourites.
I have all my music in my "Musec" folder. Each song has the following names: "Artist - Name of Song"
But once I found the problem of not finding my absolute favourite ones, I renamed all my music with the following names: "Genre & Artist - Name of the Song" and some others are named like this: "Languge & Artist - Name of Song"

Having my music by genre and alphabetical order makes it easy to find my favourite songs. To be honest, I'm also very selective.
Captura.PNG


Also... If I have 14.5GB with just 2616 files... how much space does 30000 files is?
 

leonmagnus99

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
3,697
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
Seinegald
XP
2,776
Country
Iraq
hm, i do not save up songs, i used to do that.

i tend to get bored of the songs i save up, there are very few songs i do not get bored of ..
so i always have to have some new songs.
 

DrGreed

Luigi from Luigi's Mansion
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
599
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
1,393
Country
United States
hm, i do not save up songs, i used to do that.

i tend to get bored of the songs i save up, there are very few songs i do not get bored of ..
so i always have to have some new songs.
Same here. I'm always looking for new stuff and tire quickly of music I've heard 100 times or more.
 

enarky

owls?
Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
1,223
Trophies
1
XP
2,026
Country
Afghanistan
hm, i do not save up songs, i used to do that.

i tend to get bored of the songs i save up, there are very few songs i do not get bored of ..
so i always have to have some new songs.

Same here. I'm always looking for new stuff and tire quickly of music I've heard 100 times or more.

That's where the hoarder mentality comes in. ;) I used to listen to 400-700 albums/year in my younger days, only deleted one when I absolutely hated it.

That being said, sounds like these 30000 songs is kind of a bastard collection from various sources. If you haven't organized them yourself and don't know how reliable tags, file- and foldernames are I'd delete it and start over myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wicksand420

DrGreed

Luigi from Luigi's Mansion
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
599
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
1,393
Country
United States
That's where the hoarder mentality comes in. ;) I used to listen to 400-700 albums/year in my younger days, only deleted one when I absolutely hated it.

That being said, sounds like these 30000 songs is kind of a bastard collection from various sources. If you haven't organized them yourself and don't know how reliable tags, file- and foldernames are I'd delete it and start over myself.
I'm very picky about the music I listen to. It has give me a curtain feeling or sound good lyrically and musically. So it's hard to have a 10000 song list when very few appeal to me. Don't know why I'm like that.
 

Pedeadstrian

GBAtemp's Official frill-necked lizard.
Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Messages
3,964
Trophies
2
Location
Sandy Eggo
XP
3,608
Country
United States
That being said, sounds like these 30000 songs is kind of a bastard collection from various sources.
Indeed. My first thought was a massive torrent (or combination of torrents). Aside from listening to them all, I can't think of any way to "efficiently" sift through a massive playlist. Unless the OP is speaking purely objectively, where they want highest bit rate, but I would imagine that would be rather easy to parse.
 

ov3rkill

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,666
Trophies
1
Location
in a cardboard box
XP
1,967
Country
Australia
Delete them all. Download better songs in FLAC or at least any lossless type format. Get a better DAC, AMP, and a good quality headset/speaker for an eargasmic experience. Most of them should be tagged properly.
 

Gizametalman

Banned!
Banned
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
974
Trophies
0
Age
29
Location
D.F. - Zona Cero.
XP
685
Country
Mexico
depends on the quality of the music, codec, how long they are, ect

heres 15000 though

EcAbtoc.png

Heres 10000 songs in FLAC only.
L3jM3G6v.png

:wtf:
Oh my gawd. Look at all that precious space.

Well, be realistic. Do you really need 250+ GB of music?
I'm not trying to criticize you, but try to be more selective.

Quality over Quantity.
 
Last edited by Gizametalman,

migles

All my gbatemp friends are now mods, except for me
Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Messages
8,034
Trophies
0
Location
Earth-chan
XP
5,234
Country
China
Delete them all. Download better songs in FLAC or at least any lossless type format. Get a better DAC, AMP, and a good quality headset/speaker for an eargasmic experience. Most of them should be tagged properly.
does flac has a good organization or supports tagging like mp3?
 

ov3rkill

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,666
Trophies
1
Location
in a cardboard box
XP
1,967
Country
Australia
@migles
Yes. They have different tagging. I'm not sure if it's better or worse though.
The major point in collecting music at this age is that if you're archiving or collecting music, might as well collect the high-quality lossless format.
It's just a personal preference really since there are many considerations like how much space are you willing to give for this collection as lossless have bigger file size than mp3. There's also compatibility with some older audio players. And most of all, the quality is definitely better. You should consider it if you're an audiophile or you want to experience music to a whole new level.

@TS
As for tagging, try mp3tag, beets, or musicbrainz picard.
Try it on single folder/album first, not all at once as it might break your current tagged collection.
Or you'll be having a hard time looking for a specific song.
Try what works best for you.
 

Xathya

residence aparents trols of temps
Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
441
Trophies
0
Location
green hil zone
Website
knucklestheechidna.com
XP
184
Country
Australia
i have used the windows medio player for a while, xspceials since the windows 10 with "grooves", but whats point of having the 30 thousands of song? the human ears doesnt have bearl enough ram memories to process all the mp3 in lifetime.... only if you have mozart ear and listen to googd hearphones with .waves
 

Spectral Blizzard

GBATemp's Only Racist Stereotypical Feminist
OP
Banned
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
685
Trophies
0
Location
Everywhere
XP
373
Country
United States
*AHEM*
It's organized(ish) and it is a mix of MP3, WAV, FLAC, OGG, and various ADPCM files from video games.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Indeed. My first thought was a massive torrent (or combination of torrents). Aside from listening to them all, I can't think of any way to "efficiently" sift through a massive playlist. Unless the OP is speaking purely objectively, where they want highest bit rate, but I would imagine that would be rather easy to parse.
BTW, It's not torrent. Some people on this forum know I don't pirate.
Yes, I hand ripped them all way back then.
 

Pedeadstrian

GBAtemp's Official frill-necked lizard.
Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Messages
3,964
Trophies
2
Location
Sandy Eggo
XP
3,608
Country
United States
*AHEM*
It's organized(ish) and it is a mix of MP3, WAV, FLAC, OGG, and various ADPCM files from video games.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


BTW, It's not torrent. Some people on this forum know I don't pirate.
Yes, I hand ripped them all way back then.
Regardless of where it came from, you've yet to give us the metric you use to define "best." The song you like the most? Listen to them all. Highest bit rates? Simple players like Winamp allow options to sort by bit rate. Most popular? Write down a list of sources and composers and google "Top X Video Game Songs" videos/blogs.
 

You may also like...

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    it's a never ending battle to collect, restore and take care of those poor machines
    +1
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    if only they could talk
    +1
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    it be one noisy room
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    I have around maybe 13-14 consoles.
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    Woah, how dusty is your PS3?!
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    not the worst dust in a PS3 I ever seen
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    Hopefully mine hasn't collected any.
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    Its still working fine surprisingly.
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    if mine ever YLOD, I'll replace the caps
    +1
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    for now, I'm more worried about the original Xboxes I have
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    It's only the older revisions that have leaky caps.
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    and the Trayloader G3 iMac...
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    v1.6x should be alright.
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    all xboxes suffer from shit caps
    +1
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    capacitor plague
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    Oh, I know a lot about capacitor plague.
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    not to mention the fact that capacitors simply have a shortish lifespan, even newer ones ;p
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    Somebody stole an unfinished capacitor recipe, working for Nichicon, gave it to a Chinese factory and made tons of them.
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    decade worth of timebombs in all sorts of electronics
    +1
  • DinohScene @ DinohScene:
    anyway, I'm off
    +1
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    This occured on many computer motherboards and other electronic devices.
  • M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ:
    Aight, see ya later.
    M4x1mumReZ @ M4x1mumReZ: Aight, see ya later.