Hacking Is it possible to return on v1 a9lh ?

[nooby89]

Any tutorial about that ?
I really need to know...

Thanks.

 

[ihaveahax]

why exactly do you need to?

 

[nooby89]

To help several people by translating it into French.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

But if no tutorial exists about this, it does not matter.

 

[75mak]

Heard a9lh v1 was better for the nand. All these reports of nand going faulty started with a9lh v2

 

[nooby89]

But a9lh support more payloads.

 

[Posghetti]

I've had no problems since going to A9LH v2

 

[Deleted User]

Heard a9lh v1 was better for the nand. All these reports of nand going faulty started with a9lh v2

really? guess i'm not gonna update then. just for safety.

 

[75mak]

Well it's not confirmed just some stuff that some other random people on here were trying to piece together ....


Those in the know strictly deny it has anything to do with it.

 

[nooby89]

Me I have just one problem with a payload...

 

[Chrushev]

Well it's not confirmed just some stuff that some other random people on here were trying to piece together ....


Those in the know strictly deny it has anything to do with it.

Is there a thread discussing this somewhere? Who is affected? Only people without emunand? Or are SDCards dying because emunand is on them? A link would be appreciated.

 

[dradonhunter11]

I don't have any problem with A9LH v.2 XD It even better than before

 

[Chrushev]

I don't have any problem with A9LH v.2 XD It even better than before

What exactly is the difference between v2 and v1? Just bigger payloads?

 

[nooby89]

I thinks

 

[dradonhunter11]

What exactly is the difference between v2 and v1? Just bigger payloads?

Yeah, but it better Idk why, A9LH v1 was alway crashing with me (maybe because my crazy rom hack was to much) but with A9LH v2 Idk why, it stopped to crash

 

[ihaveahax]

Heard a9lh v1 was better for the nand. All these reports of nand going faulty started with a9lh v2

you mean "people can't read instructions", because that makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[CeeDee]

I'm on some old A9LH version with screeninit. I haven't been keeping too much track of what I need to be on, but it works with Luma3DS so it's okay with me. What's v2 do?

 

[evandixon]

What's v2 do?

It gives more space for payloads, so CFW in your NAND can be a thing, for example.

 

[Halvorsen]

Heard a9lh v1 was better for the nand. All these reports of nand going faulty started with a9lh v2

Those were always a thing; V2 has nothing to do with it

 

[The Catboy]

Heard a9lh v1 was better for the nand. All these reports of nand going faulty started with a9lh v2

Faulty NAND's are extremely unlikely and all cases are results of hardware failure unrelated to A9LH. There's also cases where other bits of hardware not related to the NAND fail, causing issues as well.

 

[Redferne]

And you should just be able to re-run SafeA9LHInstaller with the files from A9LH1 to downgrade safely. .

Don't do that unless you want to brick.
From Aurora github:

WARNING: the stage1 binaries which can be used with 2.0 are mutually incompatible with the ones usable with 1.x. Using old stage1s with 2.0, or new stage1s with 1.x WILL LEAD TO AN UNRECOVERABLE BRICK. As of now, both delebile's and my own fork of A9LH have been updated for this. DON'T USE pre-made stage payload bins found randomly on the internet (Plailect's guide will be updated for this).

If you want to go back to v1 use this version:
https://github.com/d0k3/SafeA9LHInstaller/releases
Be absolutely sure to use v1 payloads and FIRM or you'll brick.