He wants to make it so that stock firmware has that functionality because he frequently switches between OFW and CFW. This is impossible without running CFW on SysNAND, which breaks Nintendo's Terms of Service. So if he sends it to Nintendo, they can, if they see that he ever ran unsigned code, refuse to fix any problems it has, so even if he would ever wish to give up on CFW on that Switch just to fix it (Nintendo would patch RCM at the repair center), he would be unable to. It's not worth it. Just buy an RCM dongle and call it a day.
Edit: The Switch has a TON of telemetry. Atmosphere's module replacements remove all of it, but stock with only the reboot to payload feature will not do so.
still only 600-700 nits i have to use the contrast enhancer to make bright lights look as bright as they are supposed to but the alternative was the next tier up and buying a demo model that would've been about the same cost, that had 1000 nits but issues with black crush
Human vision is logarithmic, it's not linear. And nits doesn't tell the whole story of perceived brightness. OLED'S look brighter then LCD's even when both are set to the same nit values because of the higher contrast ratio on OLED's
"And nits doesn't tell the whole story of perceived brightness" it's not about perceived brightness it's about all HDR content in TV and movies being mastered for 1000 nits so it doesn't look right with anything lower, it's also about dynamic range
OLED's can get away with a lower peak brightness and still provide punchy HDR because of their contrast ratio. Like I said human vision is logarithmic. The higher the peak brightness the diminishing returns in perceived brightness.
@The Real Jdbye Oleds hit around 750 nits nowadays. The difference between a 1000 nit and a 750 nit isn't huge. It's only about a 4% increase in perceived brightness. Not huge at all. You'll need at least 2000 nit displays to notice a bigger difference.