1. GhostLatte

    OP GhostLatte GBAtemp's Official Van Master™
    Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2015
    Messages:
    3,357
    Country:
    Antarctica
    Personally, I have to disagree, but I'm curious to hear the beliefs of you guys. Please keep it civil.
     
    CallmeBerto likes this.
  2. B_E_P_I_S_M_A_N

    B_E_P_I_S_M_A_N knows nothing
    Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2016
    Messages:
    1,560
    Country:
    Antarctica
    I side with Snowden. What the government was doing was wrong, and it was very noble of him to expose this needless surveillance to the American public, at the expense of any hope of returning to his home country.

    Balancing safety and freedom always seems to be a balancing act. Safety always comes at the cost of some level of autonomy in order to protect the greater good. The question is: at what point should people reject safety in the name of individual freedom?
     
    CallmeBerto likes this.
  3. CallmeBerto

    CallmeBerto The Lone Wanderer
    Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Messages:
    1,315
    Country:
    United States
    Agree with Bep on this one.

    To answer his question though - Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
     
    B_E_P_I_S_M_A_N likes this.
  4. linuxares

    linuxares I'm not a generous god!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7,309
    Country:
    Sweden
    Well you guys got the second additament for this very reason. So you can't ever get a dictator. But when the whole state is one? That's the hard cookie!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted
Loading...

Hide similar threads Similar threads with keywords - traitor, Snowden, Edward