prwlr. said:You opt-in/out for the location tracking on Android.
The problem is I really don't think they could legally use the information to do that, even if it is morally rightBlebleman said:Guys, what about potential good uses for this? For example, finding a kidnapped person?
No, I'm talking about when you first set up your Android, it gives you an option (two actually) if you want to Google to track your location.Zorua said:prwlr. said:You opt-in/out for the location tracking on Android.
Are you talking about Google Latitude?
That's completely different.
Apple can't, but if they go through the proper channels, the FBI definitely can.DeathStrudel said:The problem is I really don't think they could legally use the information to do that, even if it is morally rightBlebleman said:Guys, what about potential good uses for this? For example, finding a kidnapped person?
Good point, I wasn't really thinking about it that wayUrza said:Apple can't, but if they go through the proper channels, the FBI definitely can.DeathStrudel said:The problem is I really don't think they could legally use the information to do that, even if it is morally rightBlebleman said:Guys, what about potential good uses for this? For example, finding a kidnapped person?
"The more fundamental problem is that Apple are collecting this information at all. It normally requires a court order to gain access to it, whereas this is available to anyone who can get their hands on your phone or computer."Urza said:And it should be mentioned, Apple doesn't actually have this information on-hand. It's not being sent anywhere (whether or not this will change at some point is of course unknown) and only exists on your local devices.
Indeed. Apple would be in a pretty tight spot if something like that happenedcwstjdenobs said:DeathStrudel, there's also the possibility of exploits or malware making this available remotely as well.
There's plenty of other, probably more sensitive information (like logins, emails, contact info, texts etc) stored on each and every smartphone.DeathStrudel said:DeathStrudel, there's also the possibility of exploits or malware making this available remotely as well.Urza said:And it should be mentioned, Apple doesn't actually have this information on-hand. It's not being sent anywhere (whether or not this will change at some point is of course unknown) and only exists on your local devices.
"The more fundamental problem is that Apple are collecting this information at all. It normally requires a court order to gain access to it, whereas this is available to anyone who can get their hands on your phone or computer."
Thats the problem
I am capable of reading, and have been aware of this story for several days (this is old news). Many posters in this thread seemed to be confused on that issue, and thus I was clarifying.
QUOTE
People do fucked up things for reasons other than moneyUrza said:I don't see any financial incentive for a malware developer to target this location information.DeathStrudel said:lol, I'm glad you can read and I don't really care how long you've known about this. I wasn't trying to attack your statement, I was just adding to it to point out the negatives to this situationUrza said:And it should be mentioned, Apple doesn't actually have this information on-hand. It's not being sent anywhere (whether or not this will change at some point is of course unknown) and only exists on your local devices.
"The more fundamental problem is that Apple are collecting this information at all. It normally requires a court order to gain access to it, whereas this is available to anyone who can get their hands on your phone or computer."
Thats the problem
I am capable of reading, and have been aware of this story for several days (this is old news). Many posters in this thread seemed to be confused on that issue, and thus I was clarifying.
QUOTE(Urza @ Apr 24 2011, 09:54 AM)
Someone could ambush you and smash your device to bits. Does that make it's existence as a physical object a liability?DeathStrudel said:People do fucked up things for reasons other than money
haha, whatever man, you're taking this shit way to seriously.Urza said:Someone could ambush you and smash your device to bits. Does that make it's existence as a physical object a liability?DeathStrudel said:People do fucked up things for reasons other than money
Someone could break into your house as you sleep and chop off your balls. Does that make their existence as physical objects a liability?
The fact that some random psycho could potentially take some astronomically unlikely action is not cogent to discussing the potental detriments concerning this story.
I wouldn't say I was taking it more seriously than anyone else here.DeathStrudel said:haha, whatever man, you're taking this shit way to seriously.Urza said:Someone could ambush you and smash your device to bits. Does that make it's existence as a physical object a liability?DeathStrudel said:People do fucked up things for reasons other than money
Someone could break into your house as you sleep and chop off your balls. Does that make their existence as physical objects a liability?
The fact that some random psycho could potentially take some astronomically unlikely action is not cogent to discussing the potental detriments concerning this story.
But anyways, IMO privacy is very important and should be highly respected, therefore I believe that this information shouldn't be stored on you phone however unlikely it is that somebody is going to try to access it.
...not really, all you've done is made a sad attempt to make yourself look intelligent. I know people that have made viruses just to fuck with people, that's all they got out of it, so I don't see how it's logical to assert as a fact that it is "astronomically unlikely" that somebody would do it. And like I said before, it doesn't really matter how likely it is that somebody will try to fuck with your shit, it's about privacy. You have a right to privacy and they are invading your privacy when they do something like this without telling you.Urza said:I wouldn't say I was taking it more seriously than anyone else here.DeathStrudel said:haha, whatever man, you're taking this shit way to seriously.Urza said:Someone could ambush you and smash your device to bits. Does that make it's existence as a physical object a liability?DeathStrudel said:People do fucked up things for reasons other than money
Someone could break into your house as you sleep and chop off your balls. Does that make their existence as physical objects a liability?
The fact that some random psycho could potentially take some astronomically unlikely action is not cogent to discussing the potental detriments concerning this story.
But anyways, IMO privacy is very important and should be highly respected, therefore I believe that this information shouldn't be stored on you phone however unlikely it is that somebody is going to try to access it.
I'm just the only one thinking logically.