- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,052
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 38
- Location
- Vancouver, BC
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 352
- Country
So here's the vid.
[fact]
The first loading picture of 360 version appears at 53s, the loading finishes at 99s : Loading 46 seconds
The first loading picture of PS3 version appears at 59s, the loading finishes at 116s : Loading 60 seconds
The loading time difference is about 23.4%
According to abgx.net, 360 version is 6.8 billion bytes zipped -> unzipped to 7.6 billion bytes
According to abgx.net, PS3 version is 11.4 billion bytes zipped -> who the hell downloads PS3 image anyways? let me know the unzipped size
The data size difference is about 41.4% comparing both zipped
Note: I used billion bytes instead of GB because abgx definition of MB is million bytes, not 1048576
[/fact]
[propaganda]
46s is way shorter than 60s therefore 360 version is superior without a doubt.
[/propaganda]
I need someone to convince me that 23.4 is bigger than 41.4 before agreeing on 360's superiority.
Ever heard of the chinese expression "????(morning three night four)?"
When a guy said he'll give three (whatever monkeys were fed) for breakfast and four for dinner, monkeys were all mad.
When that guy said then he'll give four in the morning and three at night, monkeys were all happy.
360 initial loading is faster than the PS3's, and PS3's in-game loading is faster than the 360's.
But people who post at GT seem to think that 4+3 is bigger than 3+4. (And PS3 fanboys can't accept the fact that 4 in the morning is bigger than 3 in the morning)
P.S. Why would the video maker bother make a 2 minute initial loading video but not make a short few seconds in-game loading video? I think the answer lies somewhere in this post.
Edit: video fixed
[fact]
The first loading picture of 360 version appears at 53s, the loading finishes at 99s : Loading 46 seconds
The first loading picture of PS3 version appears at 59s, the loading finishes at 116s : Loading 60 seconds
The loading time difference is about 23.4%
According to abgx.net, 360 version is 6.8 billion bytes zipped -> unzipped to 7.6 billion bytes
According to abgx.net, PS3 version is 11.4 billion bytes zipped -> who the hell downloads PS3 image anyways? let me know the unzipped size
The data size difference is about 41.4% comparing both zipped
Note: I used billion bytes instead of GB because abgx definition of MB is million bytes, not 1048576
[/fact]
[propaganda]
46s is way shorter than 60s therefore 360 version is superior without a doubt.
[/propaganda]
I need someone to convince me that 23.4 is bigger than 41.4 before agreeing on 360's superiority.
Ever heard of the chinese expression "????(morning three night four)?"
When a guy said he'll give three (whatever monkeys were fed) for breakfast and four for dinner, monkeys were all mad.
When that guy said then he'll give four in the morning and three at night, monkeys were all happy.
360 initial loading is faster than the PS3's, and PS3's in-game loading is faster than the 360's.
But people who post at GT seem to think that 4+3 is bigger than 3+4. (And PS3 fanboys can't accept the fact that 4 in the morning is bigger than 3 in the morning)
P.S. Why would the video maker bother make a 2 minute initial loading video but not make a short few seconds in-game loading video? I think the answer lies somewhere in this post.
Edit: video fixed