Intel vs. AMD

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by Verocity, Mar 9, 2007.

?

Which is better for pure performance? Intel or AMD.

  1. Intel

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. AMD

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Mar 9, 2007

Intel vs. AMD by Verocity at 5:32 PM (2,375 Views / 0 Likes) 34 replies

  1. Verocity
    OP

    Member Verocity Ö!

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    727
    Location:
    Georgia
    Country:
    United States
    Just wondering what GBAtemp thinks is best for a processor in all over performance, is it Intel or AMD? Just think of the best processor that both makes and post your opinion.

    Honestly I vote Intel, for the Intel Core 2 Quad. But people say that AMD is better for gaming, lets see the results..
     


  2. Kyoji

    Member Kyoji ウッーウッーウマ

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    5,474
    Location:
    :'(
    Country:
    United States
    With the launch of the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad, Intel officially blew AMD out of the water.
     
  3. zatelli

    Member zatelli GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    Always on the move...
    Country:
    France
    You're missing a third option: Tied up.
    You're talking about quad core CPU, but would one ever use these pricey CPUs to their full potential ? Quad Core is too powerful for personal / general use.
    AMD & Intel are not comparable, they're designed differently, even when comparing AMD Turion X2 with it's Intel counterpart.
     
  4. Shinji

    Member Shinji ҉҉ ҉҉

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,374
    Location:
    City of Delusion
    Country:
    United States
    woot~
    [​IMG]
     
  5. wohoo

    Member wohoo GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    Uppsala
    Country:
    Sweden
    with the Core 2 series, intel can crawl BACKWARDS and still be able to smoke AMD, totally in almost any app or game out there.

    but if you got a P4 or anything like it, cry, because they suck compared to the Core 2 series [​IMG]
     
  6. Verocity
    OP

    Member Verocity Ö!

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    727
    Location:
    Georgia
    Country:
    United States
    Good points..
     
  7. Shinji

    Member Shinji ҉҉ ҉҉

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,374
    Location:
    City of Delusion
    Country:
    United States
    I made the mistake of looking for a Core 2 Duo lappy under $800. I'm still determined to do so, but I guess I could fork out a little extra cause its worth it...
     
  8. Sick Wario

    Member Sick Wario Club Nintendo

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,207
    Location:
    NNID: godrugal
    Country:
    United Arab Emirates
    i was VERY happy with an athlon 64 4000 and athlon X2 3800, but my next (crysis) rig will be conroe e6600
     
  9. Mchart

    Member Mchart GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    309
    Location:
    Chicago
    Country:
    United States
    Anyone voting AMD hasn't kept up with the times. Summer of 2006 the C2D's went retail, and all the benchmarks show that an equivalent priced X2 gets blown out of the water.
     
  10. H8TR

    Member H8TR GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    t-Dot
    Country:
    Canada
    AMD is still in business right now because all there processors are less than $300 CDN (excluding FX-62 and Socket F). Intel processors are number one in performance and most likely will be for a while. AMD is in transition to 65nm and even when there new processors come out (Barcelona I think) Intel will take the C2D's to 45nm Penryn. Then it will repeat and Intel will go 32 nm with whatever its called and then Nehalem will come out for Intel etc.
     
  11. friedchicken

    Member friedchicken GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    132
    Location:
    southern california
    Country:
    United States
  12. skullstatue

    Banned skullstatue Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    463
    Country:
    United States
    I think there is a reason so many government agencies, servers, and important companies choose Intel. I have never had one fail me and I work on computers all of the time, I love them. It's personal preference, I have never really used an AMD processor (except in a couple of laptops which were the worst things I have ever used). If AMD made reliable products I would buy them, but that's not really the case in my experience. Red Side - ATI Intel, Screw the green.
     
  13. Westside

    Member Westside Sogdiana

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,905
    Location:
    Guantanamo bay
    Country:
    Uzbekistan
    AMD is far better for home uses and gaming. Intel is better for buisness, especially xenon.
     
  14. imgod22222

    Member imgod22222 GBAtemp's Original No-faced Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,555
    Country:
    United States
    Intel if you have alot of money to spend, and you need the fastest of the fast without clustering. AMD if you have a board that can support multiple CPUs or if you're a tightwad. AMD FTW tho, since all the Intels in my house are single core
     
  15. Harsky

    Member Harsky Madmin

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,262
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Off topic but I bought a new PC last september with Intel Pentium D processor and just when I was taking the packaging off, the TV announces the new core duo 2 which pissed me off a little. Is it worth upgrading or is Pentium D good enough for processing my DVDs to AVI?
     
  16. Mchart

    Member Mchart GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    309
    Location:
    Chicago
    Country:
    United States
  17. Westside

    Member Westside Sogdiana

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,905
    Location:
    Guantanamo bay
    Country:
    Uzbekistan
    Wait til the prices of Intel Core Quadro comes down (4 freakin cores!!!), that will be outstanding for encoding.
     
  18. yee

    Member yee DOTA 4EVER

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    571
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Country:
    Canada
    I don't know why all you people still say that AMD's processors are better for gaming. That was a long time ago. The current lines of Core 2 Duo Intel processors blows AMD's current X2/FX line out of the water.

    The only advantage AMD has over Intel is the pricing.
     
  19. Westside

    Member Westside Sogdiana

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,905
    Location:
    Guantanamo bay
    Country:
    Uzbekistan
    And how many of us gamers are that rich? [​IMG] Even a little difference is a big difference for us.
     
  20. moshii

    Member moshii GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    函館
    Country:
    Japan
    The Intel Vs AMD argument is pretty subjective... for example AMD always used to smoke Intel on FPU performance, but I doubt many people here know what that means. In the end it always comes down to fanboyism opposed to real facts.




    m68k FTW!
     

Share This Page