I'm still surprised Nintendo didn't file a C&D order for all of the fanmade Pokémon games.

LuxerWap

The Green Husky with a Broken Tail
OP
Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
499
Trophies
0
Age
25
Location
Roswell, Georgia
XP
691
Country
United States
Yet, they would close Mario 64 HD, AM2R, patch Homebrew and more. Pretty weird if you ask me.

Pokémon Uranium was released not too long ago, and Nintendo haven't filed the game yet. Makes me wonder why are they ignoring it.

Not saying that I want them to close the games, just saying how odd it is for them to sit and do nothing against it.

EDIT: Maybe it's too much work?
 
Last edited by LuxerWap,

RevPokemon

GBATemp's 3rd Favorite Transgirl
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
4,840
Trophies
0
Age
25
Location
Fort Gay, West Virginia
XP
2,269
Country
United States
Likewise Nintendo lets PETA make a bunch of games about their IPs and say nothing about it (even when they put Nintendo in a bad light), yet fun fan remakes are evil. Love that logic.

Anyway I found this humous
 

gamefan5

Kid Icarus Uprising connoiseur
Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
5,007
Trophies
1
Location
Somewhere in this Earth
XP
3,718
Country
Canada
That's the Pokemon Company's job to take down any copyright infrigment related events about Pokémon.

Which has happened so many times, from Pokémon themed parties (i kid u not) to even orchestra remastered Pokémon music.
Fangames however, is actually rare but it has happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CeeDee

Famrid

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
10
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
33
Country
France
I guess they like the free advertising the fanmade games gives them. Kind of some dev don't mind piracy because if the game is good i can gives them increased sale thanks to the good publicity or like the fansub scene before simulcast came.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
35,545
Trophies
2
Website
trastindustries.com
XP
25,469
Country
United Kingdom
Likewise Nintendo lets PETA make a bunch of games about their IPs and say nothing about it (even when they put Nintendo in a bad light), yet fun fan remakes are evil. Love that logic.

Depending upon what goes that can be said to be parody or satire (and though I think PETA are a bunch of morons most of the time it is pretty clearly satire and parody from where they sit), even though most takedowns are related to trademarks rather than copyright it still gets a bit tricky if you are trying to take down things on that basis.

As for the question of the OP they can't do a blanket ban, well the law theoretically says no but that is not a strong protection. They have to then respond to each and every case as it arises. I am quite surprised we don't see more of them though, I too would have thought they would have been hotter on it. That said I hope they get hotter on things and more people make fan spiritual sequels instead -- I like people revisiting classic game styles and it is great, why they have to hose it up by using artwork and such from existing works they have no rights to I have no idea.
 

CeeDee

art by @x65943
Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
5,273
Trophies
2
XP
8,785
Country
United States
Yet, they would close Mario 64 HD, AM2R, patch Homebrew and more. Pretty weird if you ask me.

Pokémon Uranium was released not too long ago, and Nintendo haven't filed the game yet. Makes me wonder why are they ignoring it.

Not saying that I want them to close the games, just saying how odd it is for them to sit and do nothing against it.

EDIT: Maybe it's too much work?
It's not Nintendo's responsibility. The Pokemon Company handles all Pokemon stuff, while Nintendo handles their own IPs like Mario or Zelda.

And to be honest, we're lucky Nintendo and TPC sit and do nothing, or else we'd have no exploits or big fangames.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
35,545
Trophies
2
Website
trastindustries.com
XP
25,469
Country
United Kingdom
It's not Nintendo's responsibility. The Pokemon Company handles all Pokemon stuff, while Nintendo handles their own IPs like Mario or Zelda.
I don't know

POKEMON
IC 028. US 022 023 038 050. G & S: board games; electronic game equipment for playing video games, game cards; [ hand-held pinball games ] non electric hand-held skill games, plush dolls, manipulative puzzles; toy action figures [, toy balloons and yo-yos ]. FIRST USE: 19981102. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19981200
(REGISTRANT) Nintendo of America Inc. CORPORATION WASHINGTON 4600 150th Avenue NE Redmond WASHINGTON 98052
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4804:v3e1zw.2.42

POKÉMON ALPHA SAPPHIRE
(REGISTRANT) Nintendo of America Inc. CORPORATION WASHINGTON 4600 150th Avenue NE Redmond WASHINGTON 98052
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4804:v3e1zw.2.18

Pokemon EU002270064
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmcase/Results/4/EU002270064
Holder's name
Nintendo Co., Ltd.
11-1 Hokotate-cho, Kamitoba, Minami-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan, 601-8501
More recent
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmcase/Results/4/EU011727377

Pokemon
http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/...p=D&p_detail=DETAILED&p_rec_no=1&p_rec_all=18
Owner/s: Nintendo Co Limited
see full address
KYOTO
JAPAN

https://www3.j-platpat.inpit.go.jp/...&S_FLAG=00&TERMOPT=02&PAGE=01&LISTNO=1&DISP=1
(732) Holder
Name 任天堂株式会社
Name 株式会社クリーチャーズ
Name 株式会社ゲームフリーク

First is Nintendo, second is creatures and third is game freak.


So in the worst case they are co owners of the thing in Japan. I guess I should check the game maker was not in Canada or something (not that I expect much different) but in most places it seems Nintendo has every right to say oi.

Also how are exploits related to any of this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seriel

CeeDee

art by @x65943
Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
5,273
Trophies
2
XP
8,785
Country
United States
So in the worst case they are co owners of the thing in Japan. I guess I should check the game maker was not in Canada or something (not that I expect much different) but in most places it seems Nintendo has every right to say oi.
Pokemon stuff should really be managed by the Pokemon Company. It's called that for a reason...


Also how are exploits related to any of this?
Yet, they would ... patch Homebrew
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
35,545
Trophies
2
Website
trastindustries.com
XP
25,469
Country
United Kingdom
Maybe it is big enough a franchise with a complex enough history that it needs to be handled by the pokemon company (or the pokemon company's enforcers/outside counsel/whatever), maybe they subcontract it back to Nintendo. It was more that the implication

Also "And to be honest, we're lucky Nintendo and TPC sit and do nothing, or else we'd have no exploits or big fangames." was what I was thinking for that. You release an exploit and it it out in the wild, job jobbed and all that. Games need a rather more lax environment to flourish (for the most part anyway), and at the same time no exploit writer has probably even sat there and paused to consider trademark law before releasing to the world. Equally not that I find fan games an especially valuable thing (as they tend to play out anyway, theoretically they could be nice and are nice if you head into ROM hacking or some rare exceptions world, that it is a rare exception rather adding fuel to the trademark fire) but there is a perfectly legitimate route in making engines and things you can overlay your chosen art assets on.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: Lol