I'm sick of bands and game devs releasing music on vinyl but not on CDs.

Veho

The man who cried "Ni".
Former Staff
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,844
Trophies
7
Age
43
Location
Zagreb
XP
54,053
Country
Croatia
And this is why bands release their stuff on analog media, because nobody wants to deal with this :rolleyes:
 

The Real Jdbye

*is birb*
Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
23,829
Trophies
5
Location
Space
XP
14,821
Country
Norway
That is the bitrate, but you're confusing it with compression rate which is a different thing.
8bit audio can be lossless purely because no compression has been applied that discards information to make it smaller.
However that 8bit audio might not have the same resolution as one recorded with 24bit, but the difference is mostly only found in the dynamic range of that track.

If you take a 24bit track and downsample it to 8 bit you get a lossy version of the track, but if it was recorded in 8bit then that's simply how it was recorded. Nothing was lost on the digital side.
Also, technically even 24bit could be considered lossy if your criteria isn't digital data but how precise the analog audio has been captured. If you take the simple plucking a guitar string and record it until it rests again you have a tone that goes smoothly from playing to stopping, and yet during digital capture you chop it up into discreet pieces instead of storing a continuous gradient.
But with 24 but resolution is so high it's virtually indistinguishable from the infinite resolution real life offers.
And even 8bit can be an accurate representation of that small infinity, assuming what you have is good enough represented by 256 steps.
Everybody says "192 kbps bitrate" (or whatever), I'm not confusing anything.

And yeah of course even 24-bit is a technical limitation, I get that. Analog formats also have certain limitations as far as the dynamic range they can reproduce and certain frequencies having more dynamic range than others, just due to quirks of the format or the equipment used to record and play them back, but those limitations aren't as black and white, they can't be reduced down to just a hard limit represented by a number. Infinite resolution would require infinite storage space and technology that doesn't exist.

I still don't quite get how the difference between 8 and 24 bit and the difference between 128 and 320 kbps are different.
 
Last edited by The Real Jdbye,

Acid_Snake

Developer
Developer
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
772
Trophies
0
Age
30
XP
2,167
Country
Spain
The answer is simple: CDs are easy to make a 1:1 copy of (easy piracy) and they aren't as "vintage looking" as Vinyl (hippy retro trends).

Other than that, anyone saying that Vinyl (or anything analog) is better than CD (or anything digital) is talking pure nonsense, physics and engineering would like to disagree with them. But what would I know, I'm just a simple computer scientist, not an "audiophile".
 
  • Like
Reactions: VinsCool

Veho

The man who cried "Ni".
Former Staff
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,844
Trophies
7
Age
43
Location
Zagreb
XP
54,053
Country
Croatia
I still don't quite get how the difference between 8 and 24 bit and the difference between 128 and 320 kbps are different.
8-bit / 24-bit refers to audio "depth".


Simplified: When recording a sound waveform, you take samples at regular intervals (~40 thousand times per second), and store the value. The more bits per sample, the more precise you can be. A raw, uncompressed recording then has a constant bitrate of 40,000*[depth in bits] bits/s. Give or take.


1729264388197.gif



Compression then does a whole bunch of math to the raw data to approximate the same waveform with simple formulas that take less space to store. Then the bitrate means how much space is taken to "describe" one second of sound. Filtering out certain frequencies, smoothing the waveform etc. reduces the required space, but also loses that information.
Using the same compression method, all other things being equal, the higher the bitrate the higher the quality.
 

Sono

cripple piss
Developer
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
2,889
Trophies
2
Location
home
XP
10,092
Country
Hungary
Everyone is talking about bits, while your smelly portable CD player probably has an 1bit PDM DAC in it. Just low-pass filter the output, and very minor distortions in the sub-bass aside, it sounds basically indistinguishable from a good quality DAC.

Similarly, you can get high-quality audio out of a GBA if you try hard enough. I know, because I tried.
GBA SP is very very noisy, but on Micro, it sounds amazing, if you filter out the sub-bass (<20Hz).
Although the noise floor is very high, so if you're using good headphones, you can hear some faint hissing. No tricks will make your GBA capable outputting more than 9bits of audio.

But yeah, more bits per sample, the more detail you can encode due to lower noise floor.
Although, 16bits already has an inaudibly low noise floor, so 24bit audio is really a circlejerk. Similarly for 44.1kHz/48kHz, any detail encoded in higher samplerate is just waste of space, as you can't even hear those higher frequencies it lets you encode in the audio data.


Edit: my point is, a well-mastered CD will get you a long way. It's lossless raw PCM audio. Any higher is very much pointless due to diminishing returns.
 
Last edited by Sono,

kijetesantakalu042

Man with 27 testicles
OP
Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2024
Messages
611
Trophies
2
Location
planet x65943
XP
1,318
Country
Antarctica
The answer is simple: CDs are easy to make a 1:1 copy of (easy piracy) and they aren't as "vintage looking" as Vinyl (hippy retro trends).

Other than that, anyone saying that Vinyl (or anything analog) is better than CD (or anything digital) is talking pure nonsense, physics and engineering would like to disagree with them. But what would I know, I'm just a simple computer scientist, not an "audiophile".
I think there are reasons of making copies of CDs. But with Vinyls they are more about novelty. You can still rip a vinyl to a flac
 

cearp

瓜老外
Developer
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
8,829
Trophies
2
XP
8,954
Country
Tuvalu
My car has a cd player, but cd isn't lossless, it's just ok. CD is 16bit 48khz but lossless audio is 24bit-32bit and 96khz-768khz and is much more detailed than cd. I get mine from www.hdtracks.com
all lossless means is that the input is same as the output.
  • if you have a text file on your computer, and you put it on a usb drive, that's lossless
  • if you have a text file on your computer, and you zip it then put it on a usb drive, (when you unzip it) that's lossless
  • if you want to save some space on your usb drive, and so you edit the text file to shorten some unimportant words that you think no one will notice, that's lossy - not losseless
so if you copy the audio from the cd and keep all the audio data perfectly intact (compressed or uncompressed), that's lossless.

cd audio is perfectly hires enough for most and their speakers.
of course, it's nice in archival terms to have as high res / data dense digital form of the original audio sound waves that were recorded on the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sono and VinsCool

Rolfie

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 19, 2023
Messages
80
Trophies
1
Age
19
Location
iwatodai dorm
XP
533
Country
Norway
i tbh don't see this exact situation a lot. but the bands i like do release limited editions with bonus tracks only on vinyl usually.
that ends up making smth like 4 discs... kinda wasteful
 

JeepX87

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
2,060
Trophies
1
Age
36
XP
3,829
Country
United States
I grew up with cassette tapes.
Same here, my parents collected a lot of cassette tapes in 1980s and early 1990s.

I was told that many deaf people prefer cassette tapes because it allow extremely loud music without force ejection, so not sure if it is true.
 

Avalyn

Ancient Enchanted Sorceress
Member
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
476
Trophies
2
Location
the northern cold...
XP
1,719
Country
Denmark
Same here, my parents collected a lot of cassette tapes in 1980s and early 1990s.

I was told that many deaf people prefer cassette tapes because it allow extremely loud music without force ejection, so not sure if it is true.
Force ejection?
Digital would be best for deaf people, as it has higher frequency response in the lower levels of the spectrum, which is what you can feel - bass, kickdrums etc.
 

JeepX87

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
2,060
Trophies
1
Age
36
XP
3,829
Country
United States
Force ejection?
Digital would be best for deaf people, as it has higher frequency response in the lower levels of the spectrum, which is what you can feel - bass, kickdrums etc.
or skip, not 100% sure.

Back in 80s and 90s that where deaf people rather to play music very loud with vibration and bass, so they found cassette to be very reliable than CD and vinyl LP. Before CD became exist on market like back in 70s, they preferred cassette over LP.

The cassette popularity faded out in early 2000s, so CD was cheap option and iPod was very new at that time. I didn't find portable CD player to be pleasant to make a enough bass, so I lost interest in music after all. Some deaf people have stereo with very loud speakers.

I guess that CD technology in 2000s was better than in 1980s, hmm.
 

coderNoob

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Aug 12, 2023
Messages
11
Trophies
0
Age
31
XP
123
Country
United States
The goal is not to have all the formats available anymore and it's very easier to understand. People just don't buy it anymore. Very simple!
Vinyl still a thing not only because some "old" people still like it but because it also became a trend among young generation and new collectors. Nobody cares if you have a big collection of CDs but people still find it cool and nostalgic a big shelf full of vinyl.
It is also not about having the "best sound quality" in my opinion it is all about the nostalgia and overall better quality physical media and artwork...
I'm a collector myself of all formats but only for games (I don't know why considering that I cant just play having the disc but...), music / concerts. And I only buy CDs if the they have limited or collectors edition as good as vinyl has.
 

MFDC12

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
873
Trophies
1
Age
33
XP
1,209
Country
United States
The only people who listen to vinyl are on those cheap Crosley turntables with a stylus that will damage records if you play them multiple times. Something like an Audio-Technica AT-LP120 is much better at a reasonable price than cheap Chinese garbage. Vinyl also sounds better, too, if you've got the proper equipment and have maintained them well. Since I don't have my old vinyl turntable anymore, I still have CDs that are a lot simpler to use than anything.


Compact Discs are different to vinyl and 8-track.
I cringe every time I see someone walk out of a store with a crosley and the like, or if I go over to someone’s house and they have one. I’ll tell them (not the strangers, my friends) it’ll damage their records, but they couldn’t care. Most modern vinyl is all shit quality anyways because most things are pressed through GZ media, who are absolute dogshit when it comes to QC. I stopped buying records because of them. I’ll only buy something if I know it didn’t come from their plant and was mastered properly.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Now I have to go run out to my truck to get a new can and it's dark and cold and wet and windy :(
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Don't huff the cleaner in the store wait tell you get to your car
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    They were talking about how a principal and assistant tried framing a kid with a weed cartridge on the radio and I'm just like how did that kid get hated that much
    +2
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    of course it's texas
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    shithole state
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Florida would also be acceptable
  • darkscyht3s @ darkscyht3s:
    when reading upon the instructions on how to use YANBF it says to drag apfix.pck and widescreen.pck but there is no apfix.pck in the current version download of twilight 7z
  • darkscyht3s @ darkscyht3s:
    im
    on windows btw
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @darkscyht3s, Make a thread in the DS section.
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Hi @SylverReZ How are you, at this hour?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Can't even get to sleep.
    +2
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    Hate how microsoft wants me to use the outlook app instead of letting me simply look at my calendar
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    It's looking out for you
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    I could drive for an hour and suffocate bill gates.
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    Don't fight me, bill
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    Found his address.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    https://a.co/d/jc0KUK6 Sir I smell alcohol
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Oh shit fr? Let's get wasted.
    +2
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    The one problem I have with a lot of beard balms like that is that they smell so intensely that it's like the only thing I can smell for an hour
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Question, what does a beard balm/wax actually do? Is it just a hair oil product, or does it act as a gel and shapes it or what?
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Yeah it's a hair oil, kind of like a leave-in conditioner, but it also helps to keep your skin under the beard moisturized a bit, and since it is oily it does help a tiny bit with helping it hold its shape or lay flatter especially after brushing it
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I rarely ever use it, really only if I'm going out and trying to look/smell a tiny bit nicer. Kind of like how I treat cologne lol
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    The one I have right now that I use every once in a while is tobacco + vanilla scented. It smells -fantastic- IMO, but same issue, for like the first hour or two it is just an ever present scent that I smell on every single inhale.
    Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy: The one I have right now that I use every once in a while is tobacco + vanilla scented. It...