You said "the average white person has more disposable income" in your previous post. This seems like you are saying that people of color can't be mass shooters because they are systematically poorer than whites. When you add that sentence with this reply, you're saying that because people of color were poor at one time, they will likely never be successful.
That is not true, it is flawed logic and not what I said.
It is just a matter of population and geometric growth.
With time it will grow, and also it is not a matter of race as I said, it is a matter of previous status quo.
It is not about white, black or whatever, it is not about race actually, but when race is tied to previous status in some land then it becomes statistically tied until (and if) the situation reverts.
Just to make the point to make you see what I am talking is not about a race in particular: If you go to China or Japan, then white people resident there will not be -in average- the ones with the better economical standing.
Sounds like a very racist thing to say to me.
Look, if all you want is to argue I am not in the mood. I will leave you to enjoy your endeavors on your own. "This sounds very grumpy to me", whatever, not a kid anymore.
Also, this "theory" about inherited wealth has been debunked time and time again just like the gender wage gap. Anybody who works hard enough can become successful in life. Even a millionaire can lose it all and end up homeless. Please stop listening to the fake news on CNN and Vox as they do not think facts matter.
That is not true, but again look for somebody else to argue with. And stop talking about that fake American companies, I don't give a fuck about what the media feeds you all, where the hell do you get the idea that I go out of my way to watch propaganda meant for Americans?
You may want to do background checks on some of the mass shooters that were in that internet photo you said could have been falsified in your previous post. A lot of them have criminal records. Just because you don't know of them, that doesn't mean they are not "known criminals". The fake news media only show you the mass shootings that fit their narrative of white people killing POC's. They couldn't care less about mass shootings from gang violence or any non-whites especially if they occur in poorer communities.
Again with the fake news. Boring.
Also this is moving the goalpost in some way. It is very interesting how "mass shooting" has been defined to go for those pictures.
When I talk about mass shootings I mean unexpected mass shootings in places one would consider safe, in the same vein of serial killers. That concept of mass shooting is exactly what makes the average person feel quite unsafe, because no matter if you don't involve yourself in criminal activities or if you avoid danger zones that might be raided by gangs, you can all the same be affected by a mass shooting. It does not work at all like organized crime, it doesn't really have an organized purpose that you could avoid... it is just domestic terrorism.
The concept of mass shooting used for coming up with that picture you posted is genius in the way it moves the goalpost, I really believe Goebbels would have been proud of the person that came up with that idea. This concept is not what I talk about when I talk about mass shootings, and I would say nobody else actually thinks of that concept either.
Average citizen, huh? I don't know where you come from, but where I come from, the average citizen doesn't go shooting up people because they are angry or for any reason. I know some crazy people and none of them has ever shot one person, let alone committed mass shootings.
Well, if you actually come from America, I think it is the only place where more than one digit mass shootings per year occur in the whole world, so even though I never though about it, perhaps yes: the place where you come from is the only where more citizens than average go shooting people because they are angry or for some reason... the ONLY place in the world.
