God that was tl;dr. But I skimmed.
Scribblenauts is getting a PC release.
Rayman Legends, admittedly I'm a bit notorious for loving Origins (and I do), but a platformer is never aconsole seller to me. Call me shallow but I certainly won't put down $300 or so on a new platform to play a couple hour platformer.
Tank Tank Tank looked like shit from the demo I saw. Very dull looking.
NSMBU, again, look at my Rayman mention and I really don't care much for the franchise any more. It's not that it's bad, it's just not really mind blowing. It seems very "safe", to borrow a word from Game Grumps. It doesn't really try much, it's serviceable but predictable. Like the 3D Mario platformers take some huge strides and chances. Super Mario 64, revolutionary without even needing to bring up why. Sunshine, admittedly I think it's an utter shit game, but at least it tried something new than resurfacing SM64. Galaxy, a 3D platformer for the record books that took the franchise in a very positive direction. While SMG2 was admittedly just kinda a cash-in, it introduced a lot (like some really fun 2D levels) to make it stand out.
Nintendo Land looks boring. I don't like mini game compilations. I don't play mini game compilations. I don't buy consoles for them. I may play a game of Mario Party or WarioWare once in a blue moon with friends but I don't think the genre is very good at all. Nintendo Land feels like another glorified tech demo with boring games.
The rest are multiplats (which I'll just buy on my Xbox 360) or crap.
Also if you "only owned a Wii" for that generation you are literally retarded.