FDA Approves Cloned Meat, Milk: Newspaper

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by The Teej, Jan 17, 2008.

  1. The Teej
    OP

    The Teej Also known as The Tjalian

    Former Staff
    4,210
    5
    Jun 27, 2004
    England
    FDA Approves Cloned Meat, Milk: Newspaper

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Food and Drug Administration report finds that meat and milk from cloned animals is, for the most part, safe to eat, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

    The newspaper said it had obtained a copy of a long-awaited, 968-page "final risk assessment," from the agency ahead of release.

    It said FDA experts measured vitamins A, C, B1, B2, B6 and B12 as well as niacin, pantothenic acid, calcium, iron, phosphorous, zinc, fatty acids, cholesterol, fat, protein, amino acids and lactose in meat and milk from 600 cloned animals, including cattle and pigs.

    Levels all looked normal.

    The agency also found no health effects in animals fed meat and milk from cloned animals for more than three months.

    "Food from cattle, swine, and goat clones is as safe to eat as that from their more conventionally-bred counterparts," the newspaper quotes the report as saying.

    Last week, the European Food Safety Authority also approved the safety of meat and milk from cloned animals.

    FDA officials have said the report would likely be released later on Tuesday.

    The newspaper said the report concluded there was not enough information to rule on the safety of food from cloned sheep. It also said that food from newborn cloned cattle, which often are abnormal, "may pose some very limited human food consumption risk."

    "Moral, religious and ethical concerns ... have been raised," the newspaper quotes the FDA as saying in a commentary.

    But the agency decided to go with science alone.

    Several companies and academic laboratories have cloned farm animals and few experts predict herds of cloned animals will be providing commercial meat and milk -- mostly because the process is so expensive.

    Instead, the goal is to clone prize animals and then breed them conventionally to create herds.

    The newspaper quoted Joseph Mendelson, legal director of the Center for Food Safety, an advocacy group that petitioned FDA to restrict the sale of food from clones, as saying his group was considering legal action.

    Source: ABC News

    Thoughts? (if any?). I'm glad it's safe to eat and drink, I wouldn't be surprised by 2015 there will be some sort of initiative to use food cloning to help out people in places like Africa.
     


  2. Linkiboy

    Linkiboy GBAtemp Testing Area

    Member
    4,888
    36
    May 14, 2006
    United States
    Whats the point of using cloning? I mean, if one cow got a disease, other cloned cows would get the same disease pretty quickly

    Besides, isn't it just a hassle? :\
     
  3. Jaejae

    Jaejae Superfly Don't Used

    Member
    625
    0
    Sep 23, 2007
    New Zealand
    Auckland, New Zealand
    OH FUCK YEAH.
    If this is approved, we could be eating baconchicken, just consider it. [​IMG]
     
  4. The Teej
    OP

    The Teej Also known as The Tjalian

    Former Staff
    4,210
    5
    Jun 27, 2004
    England
    Now that it's approved, the cloning process has a better reason for happening other then "lets do it for lulz". If we can clone meat, it means we can get more food out to the world. Also, no, it doesn't mean every cow will be infected (unless the original cow was, which should have been killed anyway).

    Jaejae - You sir, are an innovator! Baconchicken will be amazing. [​IMG]
     
  5. Little

    Little I r Little

    Member
    1,227
    11
    Nov 20, 2006
    England
    This could actually lead to better quality meat, where they get rid of bad traits like high fat content etc.
     
  6. Jaejae

    Jaejae Superfly Don't Used

    Member
    625
    0
    Sep 23, 2007
    New Zealand
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Bad traits, like chicken not tasting like bacon?
     
  7. FAST6191

    FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip Reporter
    22,916
    8,592
    Nov 21, 2005
    @Linkiboy search for "nature vs nurture"

    Hopefully the lines between cloning and genetic engineering do not get too blurred (I personally have no problem eating either and have felt that way for ages but this sort of thing tends to get messed up when people who do not know what is what get involved: evolution is "just" a theory and the whole ozone layer/greenhouse effect apparently being one and the same).
     
  8. Jaejae

    Jaejae Superfly Don't Used

    Member
    625
    0
    Sep 23, 2007
    New Zealand
    Auckland, New Zealand
    I think the only real restraint on GE and cloned meats becoming the norm is religion.
    Christianity has this deep seated belief that evolution did not occur, therefore science was wrong, and must be wrong about everything else.

    (What!? A post with serious content?!)
     
  9. azotyp

    azotyp GBAtemp Maniac

    Member
    1,175
    1
    Feb 19, 2007
    Poland
    Poland
    Think about future possibilities, if someone would make lets just say cloned arm or foot, or heart , it could ne big step forward for the medicine.
    [​IMG]
     
  10. PBC

    PBC What!? I can change this??

    Member
    590
    1
    Dec 3, 2006
    United States
    New York
    Can't they clone really cute puppies instead?? I mean...a cows and cow. A puppy is forever....Or they should make puppies last forever. Now that is science
     
  11. Rayder

    Rayder Mostly lurking lately....

    Former Staff
    6,613
    130
    Jan 14, 2007
    United States
    USA
    I can see cloning being a good idea IF it lowers the cost of buying food. Sadly, the opposite will likely result.
     
  12. Sonicslasher

    Sonicslasher In Law we trust.

    Member
    2,230
    28
    Dec 5, 2005
    United States
    Richmond, VA
    The baconator will not be pleased!
     
  13. The Teej
    OP

    The Teej Also known as The Tjalian

    Former Staff
    4,210
    5
    Jun 27, 2004
    England
    I'm a Christian and tbh, I think evolution is probably right. I don't think the Bible actually goes against Evolution, it just doesn't mention it too much.

    I have no problem with cloning animals.
     
  14. Extreme Coder

    Extreme Coder GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    938
    0
    Nov 25, 2005
    Egypt
    Cairo, Egypt
    If this well help teh people in teh other places, then why not!
     
  15. Linkiboy

    Linkiboy GBAtemp Testing Area

    Member
    4,888
    36
    May 14, 2006
    United States
    Since I'm forced to take religion class in school, they don't actually think that the prehistory part of the bible is to be taken literally, but in context.
     
  16. mfpants50

    mfpants50 Banned

    Banned
    41
    0
    Oct 16, 2007
    United States
    Cloning just the meat = win. Vegans now have no excuse besides being assholes.
     
  17. Westside

    Westside Sogdiana

    Member
    2,905
    61
    Dec 18, 2004
    Uzbekistan
    Guantanamo bay
    Uh... Have you guys not eaten any Bacon made out of anything besides pork? since I'm a Muslim, i wanted to taste some bacon, I had to try the Chicken version of bacon. My friends said the Chicken version tastes better than pork. Cloning meat is absolutely useless, infact it has a huge list of cons. Genetically inherited diseases will be the last thing you worry about.
     
  18. Linkiboy

    Linkiboy GBAtemp Testing Area

    Member
    4,888
    36
    May 14, 2006
    United States
    Wouldn't that involve cloning a human then killing it? A human heart doesn't just suddenly grow out of nowhere.
     
  19. Gus122000

    Gus122000 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    594
    5
    Jun 15, 2007
    inb4gamecompanyscopymillionsofgamesystemsforjust1000dollars
     
  20. Westside

    Westside Sogdiana

    Member
    2,905
    61
    Dec 18, 2004
    Uzbekistan
    Guantanamo bay
    No, unless you use stem cells to become heart cells. (this was already done by scientists) You would only clone the heart, no where else.