'FCC to toughen internet rules' in the US

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by kicknhorse, Jun 18, 2010.

Jun 18, 2010
  1. kicknhorse
    OP

    Member kicknhorse GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    320
    Location:
    North Somerset
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Full article here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8745078.stm


    Where are all those Americans who said nothing like this would happen to them, this whole 'I'm proud to be an American' rubbish.

    This is just in addition to the 'kill switch' Obama will be getting for the entire US internet. So in the 'interest of national safety' Obama can kill your entire internet at any time... Now, as always, I am so glad I live outside of Amerikana.
     


  2. Matt140

    Member Matt140 GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    England
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I guess this has was somehow inspired by our Digital Economy Bill :/
     
  3. kicknhorse
    OP

    Member kicknhorse GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    320
    Location:
    North Somerset
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    You Might be right, but there is still a very good chance ours could be scrapped within the next year before in comes into force.
     
  4. TM2-Megatron

    Member TM2-Megatron Predacon Commander

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,187
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Country:
    Canada
    ?

    As I understand it, it's not their government that Americans should fear in this instance, but the large telecom companies. Net Neutrality is a good thing, and Obama has already said he supports it. The FCC is trying to formalize it and prevent the telecom companies from picking and choosing what their customers are "allowed" to access. In no way does Net Neutrality give the government control over the internet, or create any kind of "kill switch". It's about exactly the opposite of giving anyone control over the access, or the ability to censor. It's about giving the public the freedom to access whatever they want, without being made victims of the telecom industry's greed. Right now, all the telecoms do is sell access to the internet, and have no control over what you do access when you're connected... however they do want that control, so they can block or throttle services as they deem fit, and coerce their customers into paying extra for "superior" internet packages with features they could've otherwise gotten for less, or even free.

    Maybe you should actually read about the issue before starting on the America "this and that" rant.
     
  5. Bladexdsl

    Member Bladexdsl ZOMG my posts...it's over 9000!!!

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,347
    Location:
    Queensland
    Country:
    Australia
    you guys will have to make your own internet with it's own rules and put whatever you want on it. but than the fcc will come and shut it down than they'll try and censor real life [​IMG]
     
  6. kicknhorse
    OP

    Member kicknhorse GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    320
    Location:
    North Somerset
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    The 'kill switch' was in another article posted a few days ago which was within some new legislation, and unrelated to this one.

    (for example here: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technolog...tml?autostart=1

    - but I cannot see how America can assume the 'global internet' as theirs. This is like the bill they tried to pass to say America owned everything outside fo the o-zone Layer a few years ago.)

    But the FCC do also want to stop people from going to certain areas of the internet.
     
  7. TM2-Megatron

    Member TM2-Megatron Predacon Commander

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,187
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Country:
    Canada
    Such as?

    Even if they did, they have neither the power nor ability to actually do so. But as it stands, they're pushing to keep the internet the way it is now, instead of what the telecom companies want to turn it into. So what you're saying doesn't particularly make sense. Net neutrality, as it says right in the article you've quoted, is treating all data equally. It has nothing to do with censorship or control. The only thing they want to "regulate" in this instance is the companies that are interested in restricting the access of their customers.
     
  8. George Dawes

    Member George Dawes Wanker

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Messages:
    688
    Location:
    your wife's corpus uteri
    Country:
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Like living outside of amerikkka is any better. The uk has the Digital Economy Act (which is in force now, as of last week) and Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, amongst others. Plus the stuff that GCHQ and FIT get upto, that isn't "official".

    Hierarchical "leaders" the world over want to desperately stay in control, and more draconian measures will continue to be put in place across the globe.

    Megatron, you fail to see the larger picture. Once broadband is "highly regulated" by the FCC then they have the ability to control how an isp operates, what content they serve etc. An isp that doesn't toe the line will soon be shut down.

    I'm all for regulation in the interest of the consumer (such as preventing certain protocols being throttled) but you have to be incredibly naive to believe that is the case here.
     
  9. TrapperKeeperX

    Member TrapperKeeperX GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    524
    Country:
    United States
    The FCC can suck it! They're nothing but Fucking Cockblocking Clanfuckers
     
  10. exangel

    Member exangel executioner angel

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,574
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    Country:
    United States
    at least they keep our AM radio signals from interfering with each other.
     
  11. chartube12

    Member chartube12 GBAtemp Addict

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,725
    Country:
    United States
    Correct. W/o this law we could of been F***ed over by ISPs. This regulation provents Internet from becoming the next tv.
     
  12. SixtySixHundred

    Member SixtySixHundred GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    433
    Location:
    Eternia!
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    You watch too much 'Family Guy'... "His chin looks like balls, shall we cover that too?" [​IMG]

    Censorship can suck my b*lls [​IMG]
     
  13. DeltaBurnt

    Member DeltaBurnt I'm bored

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,353
    Location:
    Where intellect matters
    Country:
    United States
    I find it quite disturbing that every country is like "We're going to censor this on the internet and that on the internet". What these guys don't realize is that the internet isn't like TV. The parts of the internet that are shown to Americans, or Australians, or another country aren't specifically made/hosted in that country (as is with most of TV).

    Basically it's like having the ice cream truck drive around your neighborhood 24/7, but your parents only let you buy one flavor, and when your friends tell you about some awesome other flavor that you can't have you have no idea what they're talking about.

    Also OP sounds like he's butthurt from the world cup [​IMG]
     
  14. TwinRetro

    Global Moderator TwinRetro Don't start nothin', Won't be nothin'

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,181
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Country:
    United States
    Honestly, the FCC's way is the lesser of two evils.

    Either have a very small percentage of the internet blocked or censored...or...

    Have the ISPs decide on a "whitelist" of sites you CAN visit (based on your current package of coarse), oh! And you can forget about "unlimited" bandwidth. anything over 20GBs will get you either shut off for the month, or dial up speeds.
     
  15. DeltaBurnt

    Member DeltaBurnt I'm bored

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,353
    Location:
    Where intellect matters
    Country:
    United States
    I can totally foresee ISPs charging you extra to be able to visit piracy sites and sites like here :\
     
  16. omgpwn666

    Member omgpwn666 Guy gamer and proud!

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,535
    Location:
    Florida
    Country:
    United States
    I don't worry about this kind of stuff since it seems to never pass. And if it does, damn. (Still don't think it will happen)
     
  17. chrisrlink

    Member chrisrlink Rouge Temper

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,222
    Location:
    Unova
    Country:
    United States
    .geez i can see anarchy all over the world sooner or later and a pollutede world thanks in Part to BP if my country bans importing video games and such I'll got balistic
     
  18. DeltaBurnt

    Member DeltaBurnt I'm bored

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,353
    Location:
    Where intellect matters
    Country:
    United States
    I would imagine that the democracy of America (not trying to be an air head here saying "democracy always works" and "America is the only free country" being completely serious) would prevail.

    We can easily petition and seriously protest this if it does pass. There's enough serious internet users to repeal it.
     
  19. Slyakin

    Member Slyakin See ya suckers

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,450
    Location:
    Soviet Slyakin
    Country:
    United States
    I just have a bad feeling about this...


    DRM. AAAUUGGH.
     
  20. iamthemilkman

    Member iamthemilkman GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    446
    Country:
    United States
    The FCC needs to stay the fuck out.

    [​IMG]

    And how I ironic it all is -- the people who supposedly love free speech also love dictators and stricter regulation. Scumbags.
     

Share This Page