FAT 16 or 32?

Discussion in 'NDS - Flashcarts and Accessories' started by mike1984, Oct 19, 2007.

  1. mike1984
    OP

    mike1984 GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    111
    0
    Sep 25, 2006
    Canada
    I have an R4. Which format is better to have and why?
     
  2. roguetrip

    roguetrip GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    424
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    United States
    Fat 16 is better for anything under 2GB for better cluster size.
     
  3. HyoImowano

    HyoImowano GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    307
    1
    Apr 27, 2007
    United States
    I've heard 64kb clusters are better than 32kb, is this truth?
     
  4. ZAFDeltaForce

    ZAFDeltaForce Specialist

    Member
    2,786
    208
    Sep 9, 2006
    Senegal
    FAT16 with 64KB clusters reduces the available space of the memory card but runs fastest.
     
  5. enigmaindex

    enigmaindex the Scarecrow

    Member
    663
    0
    Oct 11, 2007
    Gold Coast, Australia
     
  6. Embrance

    Embrance Member

    Newcomer
    18
    0
    Oct 15, 2007
    United States
    FAT16 for all small card(
     
  7. xSmileCrushx

    xSmileCrushx Member

    Newcomer
    34
    0
    Aug 15, 2007
    United States
    Since everything under 2GB should be formatted to FAT 16, does that mean that if I get a 2GB Kingston I should format it to FAT 32 since it's not under 2GB? [​IMG]
     
  8. DeepFriedAsian

    DeepFriedAsian GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    318
    1
    Oct 17, 2006
    United States
    Michigan
    Wondering this too.
     
  9. 111111111

    111111111 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    516
    0
    Jan 8, 2007
    everything upto (and including) 4gb should be formatted to fat16 with 64k cluster size.

    Winxp doesn't let you do this under the gui but drop to the cli and type:

    "FORMAT X: /FS:FAT /X /Q"

    where X: is the drive you want to format.
     
  10. Sinkhead

    Sinkhead yay p1ngpong.

    Former Staff
    3,692
    0
    Nov 22, 2006
    Across the pond
    I personally use FAT32 because of the sorting, but if you're after performance then FAT16 is what you should use. It will work fine for 2GB cards.

    - Sam
     
  11. Gaffer

    Gaffer Member

    Newcomer
    12
    0
    Oct 14, 2007
    I thought FAT32 was more versatile re:filenames and more space efficient? [​IMG]


    Is FAT16 only better re:speed?
     
  12. 111111111

    111111111 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    516
    0
    Jan 8, 2007
    fat32 is more space efficient, fat16 is faster.

    Formatting a 4gig memstick to fat32 would prolly save 15meg or so over fat16 but would be a lot slower.
     
  13. Echo1

    Echo1 GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    100
    0
    Mar 20, 2007
    UK
    I've tried both FAT16 and FAT32 on my 1gig cards and the difference isn't at all noticeable (using JPN Kingston SD Cards).

    I have all mine at FAT32, now.
     
  14. Gaffer

    Gaffer Member

    Newcomer
    12
    0
    Oct 14, 2007
    Ok. Thanx for the info. I don't notice any speed issues as is (currently FAT32) so I'll stick with the space saving (only a 2Gb card).


    Cheers
     
  15. 111111111

    111111111 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    516
    0
    Jan 8, 2007
    The difference is definitely noticable using an R4 with kingston jap/toshiba memory cards. Especially on that tony hill downhill jam game. Other carts probably use better access than the R4.