As much as I insist that piracy is preservation, not theft - this is bootlegging. Bootlegging is theft. Not in the modern use case like "unlicensed" - an unlicensed piece of software isn't actually a bootleg in the traditional sense. Bootlegging is why the concept of copyright exists. It literally means the Right to Copy. Copyrights were made to stop bootleggers with many printing presses from undercutting a guy who had spent a good five years or more writing a novel and who sought to publish it with his one printing press. The existence of copyright also then allowed people to sell publishing rights, allowing anyone to become a writer. Capitalist solutions for socialist (specifically fascist, but do the different brands really matter?) problems.They also were considering making people buy Wii Points using PayPal, which is even more stupid.
Modern software piracy is preservation because it returns to that old model. Publishers aren't losing sales due to software piracy - said piracy simply allows people to keep finding stuff long after the original writers and developers have ended their work and been paid based on the sales. It also crucially prevents anyone - rights holder or otherwise - from removing or irrevocably tampering with a work. Want to buy Song of the South or the original Superhot? Good luck with the former, the latter is impossible. The only choices are either exorbitant secondhand sales for SotS, or piracy for both.
Yes, that's right. The full story of the game Superhot is locked behind piracy, because the developers and publishers got a shot of that ESG shit and self-censored. Preventing that is what piracy is for. Piracy is not about turning a profit from someone else's work. It's also about making sure that people remember dreck like Birth of a Nation, and then can see clearly that Dustborn is just the modern-day version of it.
FreeShop didn't serve any official Nintendo content either, it merely had the ability to. (That everyone used it for)OSC uses fully custom-made assets, no Nintendo property is used anywhere. Nintendo would have no legal ground to stand on - besides, OSC only serves homebrew.
It got DMCA'd on the basis of the "Nintendo 3DS" splash screen upon its CIA booting up, which unlike the Game Boy era, wasn't necessary for interoperability.
Last edited by N7Kopper,