well if he is really between 5 and 15 he deserves a praise.neardark said:Something tells me your between the age of 5 and 15 lol
spending 1.5us$ from his pocket money is much more valuable than my 30euro from my paycheck !!
R
well if he is really between 5 and 15 he deserves a praise.neardark said:Something tells me your between the age of 5 and 15 lol
redia said:djtaz,
I have patiently read all the mess and fuss about wiiboxart, and you know what my position is..
there are multiple sites offering the covers :
apart from yours my favorite is : console-cover --- custom, high quality, 5 downloads per day. I only use discarts from them...
cc-console, wii.ds-scene, gbatemp, .... also host most of the covers.. but no 3d, and not named correctly, ...
people whining are only frustrated because they now have to pay the HUGE and ENORMOUS amount of 1euro to help the scene going on, OR do it manually.. which is totally unacceptable. don't you realize that they are going to hurt their fingers !!!
duh.... a bunch on whiners ! that's all they are.
from what I understood the problem now is more on the resources used when creating on the fly packs with specific size.
well I have two possibilities in mind (I know I am no genius, just sharing my thoughts)
1- we now know the standard size of most loaders :
160x224 / 160x225 / 130x224 / 130x225 covers
160x160 / 130x160 discart
and so on...
why don't you host the actually resized imaged directly for exemple :
www.wiiboxart.com/gx/covers/xxxxx.png
www.wiiboxart.com/gx/3d/xxxxx.png
www.wiiboxart.com/coverflow/covers/xxxxx.png
www.wiiboxart.com/coverflow/3d/xxxxx.png
and so on or
www.wiiboxart.com/covers/160x224/xxxx.png
www.wiiboxart.com/covers/160x225/xxxx.png
thus the only process would be the packing.. and there I do not know/realize the impact it has on the server as you did not give us any information
2. you know I have created a little while ago my own coverdownloader / resizer. (I will wait until things are settled to see if I can adapt it to the new site to come)
the principle being pretty simple.
it creates/maintains a local repository of all the covers/discart/.... on my harddrive.
and then resize the images locally depending on the loader I want to test
I could separate the two and provide you with a small app that you would make available on your site for people wanting to resize the images.
or even modify it (when you are done with the site) to allow the implementation of the user/pass.
I did that because I noticed that not only people download the images, but they do it 200 times because they keep on switching from one loader to the other, formatting their SD, and so on...
anyway I am supporting you in your decision, hopefully people will grow up a little bit and end up understanding where you are coming from / or sharing the burden by mirroring your site.
Cheers,
R
PR0r said:by default the downloader gets standard covers at 225. I have hundreds already at 224 and i dont want to download them all at 225 and resize myself. I just want several new ones..
is there anywhere in the config file to d/l at 224? thnx
great app btw
neardark said:ThaKillerKlown said:djtaz said:I think its a good tool and the means to prevent people using this tool is entirely up to me from the sites point if view.
It just means i have to recode the site now and move all of the images around to stop it working , but thats my issue and doesnt take away from the expert work on this tool , failing that , the hosting company will shut me down as they have over the last few days , so i dont really have a choice.
Its either fix the leak on the site , or the sites gone , either way , this tool shouldnt last too long but good work on it. well done.
THIS +1
QUOTE(neardark @ Jun 30 2009, 05:23 AM) "Anyway, I've said my bit. Personally I'll get my covers elsewhere as I'm loath to pay for something that realistically shouldn't be sold in the first place."
exactly
do a poll and see how many people think he should be charging.
He isnt charging for covers, he is charging for bandwidth... You know, the service that gets the covers to you. Jesus Christ why is it so hard for you people to understand this? I donated... it was a whole dollar and a half, OMFG I hope I don't starve. If I were TAZ I'd close the damn site to EVERYONE and make it a pay site only. Fukk you ungrateful a$$holes.
Something tells me your between the age of 5 and 15 lol
It's not a "wall" of negativity... Many of us wouldn't begrudge you some profit on your efforts if you called it that instead of bandwidth. I've already donated because I think it's a worthwhile service and you deserve to be paid for it (and I'm lazy) but please stop using bandwidth as the reason for the donations because it doesn't make sense.djtaz said:Ill do my best , but when your constantly up against a wall of negativity its hard to move forward
Thank you very much , and thanks to everyone else who has offered help with this , i appreciate it allNeversoft said:Hey djTaz,djtaz said:Ill do my best , but when your constantly up against a wall of negativity its hard to move forward It's not a "wall" of negativity... Many of us wouldn't begrudge you some profit on your efforts if you called it that instead of bandwidth. I've already donated because I think it's a worthwhile service and you deserve to be paid for it (and I'm lazy) but please stop using bandwidth as the reason for the donations because it doesn't make sense.
I already posted either earlier on today or yesterday that the bandwidth has been covered - its everyone else that wont let that go.
The reason the membership system is staying is to keep the system resources reduced.
Please read :
[url=http://gbatemp.net/index.php?s=&showto...t&p=2088861]http://gbatemp.net/index.php?s=&showto...t&p=2088861[/url]
Do i get an apology ?
Posts merged
QUOTE(Muntrue @ Jun 30 2009, 02:48 PM)
If you need any assistance in programming, hit me up with a PM.
Ill be glad to help.
That is how it all started off. Then people decided they wanted to host it on their own sites.Neversoft said:Many of us wouldn't begrudge you some profit on your efforts
And many of us would. How is this any different from people profiting from selling pirate games? It's someone profiting from piracy just the same.
Copy games sure, but to pay someone money to do it? That's always been frowned upon on gbatemp. What's changed?
Why does this tool exist? There's a few people now, including me, offering EVERY FUCKING IMAGE for download in a zip or rar file for free. WTF?SmuffTheMagicDragon said:At the end of the day it's his site and he can do whatever the feck he wants with it and to hell with the rest of us.
If it was me I would have said bollox to it, shut the site down and you could all go and find your own fecking covers.
Except the people on here DID find the covers in the first place. It was a community effort. Now money is being made from it, which is one reason people are annoyed.
QUOTE(hdhacker @ Jun 30 2009, 02:49 PM)
testic-cancer said:That is how it all started off. Then people decided they wanted to host it on their own sites.Neversoft said:Many of us wouldn't begrudge you some profit on your efforts
And many of us would. How is this any different from people profiting from selling pirate games? It's someone profiting from piracy just the same.
Copy games sure, but to pay someone money to do it? That's always been frowned upon on gbatemp. What's changed?
Why does this tool exist? There's a few people now, including me, offering EVERY FUCKING IMAGE for download in a zip or rar file for free. WTF?SmuffTheMagicDragon said:At the end of the day it's his site and he can do whatever the feck he wants with it and to hell with the rest of us.
If it was me I would have said bollox to it, shut the site down and you could all go and find your own fecking covers.
Except the people on here DID find the covers in the first place. It was a community effort. Now money is being made from it, which is one reason people are annoyed.
QUOTE(hdhacker @ Jun 30 2009, 02:49 PM)
Why?, they aren't making money out of it. The artwork is under just as much copyright as the rest of the game. In the N64 days, Nintendo used to often send C&D letters threatening court action to websites that hosted boxart for free. Obviously nintendo have relaxed over time (MS get lots of hassle, but nintendo used to be a bastard of a company - not the fluffy bunnies they portray), but they could do it again if they wish. Especially over places charging.djtaz said:if displaying a box cover on a website is piracy , id speak to GBATemp about their displaying box covers - and any site that reviews games , and quite a few others.
YOU CAN ALSO PAY FOR THEM!Benjay said:YOU CAN STILL DOWNLOAD COVERS FOR FREE
djtaz said:if displaying a box cover on a website is piracy , id speak to GBATemp about their displaying box covers - and any site that reviews games , and quite a few others.
The entire purpose of usenet is not for piracy. It can be used for it, but it has many other uses (and has done for longer than piracy has existed on the net). You pay your money for the use of the entire protocol.Benjay said:i can get every game i want for free on torrent site , but with a crappy DL speed.
I can also pay 20€/month to usenext and get them at max speed.