1. bajibbles

    OP bajibbles Ragnafreak
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    Messages:
    789
    Country:
    ive had a quick look around, and everyone is basically saying R4=M3 at the moment but gbatemp has no official m3 review and god damnit i want a flashcart [​IMG]

    so

    r4 cons:

    - Basic, dated GUI
    - Lacking extra features
    - English firmware updates slower than Chinese
    - Low homebrew compatibility
    - Lacking download play support

    extra features pretty vague, also the m3 simply doesnt have them either. firmware updates it seems i can live with.

    hardware-wise and extras-wise m3 = r4

    does m3 have either of those at the moment? i cant really see one of them overtaking the other in this department and as they seem to be identical i doubt if one company dies some smartass would run the firmware on the other one. so basically im going to buy one of these soon, which? the only m3 homebrew compatability i saw in the reviews was for homebrew games, not snezzids etc. halp? [​IMG]
     
  2. Vincent Vega

    Vincent Vega GBAtemp Regular
    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    125
    Country:
    Brazil
  3. Devante

    Devante Crescent fresh at best.
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,220
    Country:
    United States
    The GUI's are still dated; they just let us change the wallpapers now. [​IMG]'
     
  4. bajibbles

    OP bajibbles Ragnafreak
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    Messages:
    789
    Country:
    ah ok... so r4 looks sexier but hasnt got the m3 name behind it. thanks [​IMG]
     
Draft saved Draft deleted